Browse articles

Kharparas mentioned in the Nabhinandana-Jinoddhara-Prabandhas

By Dasharatha Sharma

Vol. 38 · No. 4December 1962pp. 327-331English

Summary

Responding to critiques of his earlier work, the author defends his identification of the Kharparas—a people mentioned in the Jain Nabhinandana‑Jinoddhara‑Prabandhas and in several inscriptions—with the Mongols. Critics had argued that the Kharparas were a warlike tribe from Madhya Pradesh and not connected to the Mongols. The author counters by citing evidence from the Pillar Inscription of Samudragupta and three Batihagarh inscriptions, all of which mention the Kharparas in contexts involving foreign invasions. He argues that the term “Kharpara” in Sanskrit and vernacular literature consistently refers to Mongols and notes that Muslim chronicles of Alauddin Khalji’s reign describe Mongol raids that threatened Delhi. Literary sources such as the Hammiramadamardana contain characters named Kharpara Khana, whose intervention forced invaders to withdraw, aligning with accounts of Mongol attacks. The author also references passages where a governor named Malik Julachi fought against the Kharparas or Mongols in 1328–30 and was rewarded for his service. These examples, he contends, demonstrate that contemporaries equated Kharparas with Mongols. He criticises his opponents for overlooking such sources and notes that additional evidence will be presented elsewhere. Until critics can produce firm proof of a distinct Madhya Pradesh tribe named Kharpara, he maintains that the Mongol identification remains the most plausible interpretation of the term.

Conclusion

The conclusion of the attached PDF critically examines the identification of the Kharparas mentioned in historical and literary sources, debating whether they were a local tribe in Madhya Pradesh or the Mongol invaders. The work argues against simplistic or unsupported identifications, highlighting the need for strong historical evidence rather than conjecture. It emphasizes that the term "Kharpara" in various contexts and linguistic usages often refers to Mongol or Muslim invaders rather than a native tribe. The conclusion urges careful interpretation of inscriptions, literary texts, and historical records, advocating for scholarly rigor over assumptions to correctly understand the role and identity of the Kharparas in Indian history. This nuanced approach addresses long-standing controversies about their identity and suggests that equating them with Mongols is consistent with historical references and literary usage.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.