Some Chronological Considerations about Panini's Date

Summary

Vasudeva S. Agrawala’s article 'Some Chronological Considerations about Panini's Date' reevaluates the dating of the grammarian Pāṇini by examining the internal evidence of the Aṣṭādhyāyī and external historical data. Earlier scholars such as Goldstücker placed Pāṇini in the seventh century BCE, whereas others situate him after Yāska but before the Buddha. Agrawala studies the geographical and cultural horizons described in the Aṣṭādhyāyī, which mention regions from the Pamir and Sindh in the west to Kalinga and Assam in the east, suggesting that Pāṇini’s world covered a broad stretch of the subcontinentfile:///home/oai/share/563027_compressed-291-387.pdf#:~:text=Those%20who%20accepted%20the%20path,3. He analyses social and religious institutions referenced in the text, noting that Pāṇini describes the use of Nanda-style weights and measures and alludes to Nandapura and Mahānandin, implying familiarity with the Nanda dynasty. The article reviews evidence from inscriptions, coins, and astronomical references and compares the grammar with contemporaneous literature to establish relative chronology. Agrawala argues that Pāṇini lived after the Buddha and before the composition of the Arthasastra; he dismisses earlier dates that place the grammarian in the seventh or eighth century BCE and counters later dates proposed by some modern scholars. By linking Pāṇini’s mention of regions like Magadha, Kosala, and Utkala with the known political situation in the fifth century BCE, he shows that Pāṇini’s geographic horizon corresponds to the Mahajanapada period. The article also examines the argument that Pāṇini could be contemporary with Alexander’s invasion; Agrawala refutes this by pointing out that the Aṣṭādhyāyī lacks any Greek loan-words, whereas it contains vocabulary consistent with pre-Mauryan India. Concluding that Pāṇini flourished around the mid-fifth century BCE during the rule of Mahapadma Nanda, Agrawala asserts that this dating harmonises literary, numismatic, and astronomical evidence and explains why the grammar does not reflect later historical developmentsfile:///home/oai/share/563027_compressed-291-387.pdf#:~:text=Those%20who%20accepted%20the%20path,3. The article surveys diverse scholarly positions and uses political, numismatic and astronomical contexts to support a mid-fifth century BCE chronology.