Browse articles

Administration of Justice in Aurangzeb’s Time

By Sri Ram Sharma

Vol. 21 · No. 2June - 1945pp. 101-104English

Summary

Using real cases recorded in court bulletins and Jaipur archives, this article examines how justice was administered during Aurangzeb’s reign. It summarises dozens of disputes involving murder, theft, inheritance and land revenue. The Qazi required sworn testimony and, in homicide cases, often ordered the payment of blood money or oaths on the Qur’anfile:///home/oai/redirect.html. Governors intervened to remit land revenue for poor cultivators or to release debtors when relatives paid their duesfile:///home/oai/redirect.html. Hindu litigants appeared alongside Muslims, and customary law was applied flexibly. The author argues that these cases reveal a pragmatic system focused on maintaining order and revenue rather than enforcing doctrinal law. By looking at actual practice rather than legal theory, the article provides a more nuanced picture of Mughal justice.

Conclusion

The cases summarised show that Mughal justice under Aurangzeb was practical and context‑driven. Qazis and governors based their decisions on witness testimony, community consensus and fiscal considerations, often tempering strict rules with equityfile:///home/oai/redirect.htmlfile:///home/oai/redirect.html. Hindu and Muslim litigants both sought remedies, indicating inclusivity. The article demonstrates that actual legal practice was more flexible than prescriptive manuals suggest.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.