Browse articles

Was the Buddha a Theist?

By L. B. Keny

Vol. 20 · No. 4December - 1944pp. 319-333English

Summary

L. B. Keny re‑examines the question of whether Gautama Buddha taught a personal concept of God. He begins by recalling the social and religious milieu in which the Buddha lived. India in the sixth century B.C. was dominated by ritualistic Brahmanism and extreme forms of asceticism. The Buddha rejected both self‑mortification and self‑indulgence, advocating instead a middle path centred on ethical conduct, meditation and insight. Keny then summarises the Four Noble Truths, emphasising the Buddha’s diagnosis of life as suffering (duḥkha), his search for its cause and his assertion that craving (tṛṣṇā) gives rise to suffering. The extinction of craving leads to nirvāṇa, and the Noble Eightfold Path provides the practical method. According to Keny, these teachings are inherently non‑theistic: the Buddha neither posits a creator god nor regards salvation as the gift of a deity. Instead he encourages self‑reliance, rational inquiry and moral discipline. The article reviews passages from the Pāli Canon in which the Buddha remains silent when asked about cosmological absolutes; other dialogues show him diverting metaphysical questions back to the problem of suffering. Keny also considers later Mahāyāna developments, noting how concepts of the Buddha‑nature and skilful means allowed devotional practices to flourish without necessarily implying a personal creator. He discusses the deva realms described in Buddhist cosmology and explains that devas are conditioned beings subject to karma rather than omnipotent gods. The Buddha’s own insight into causation, dependent origination and impermanence runs counter to the idea of an unchanging supreme being. Keny concludes that while Buddhism accommodates reverence for enlightened beings and uses mythological language, the core doctrine does not affirm a theistic creator. The question of the Buddha’s theism is therefore misplaced: his concern was the practical eradication of suffering through understanding the mind.

Conclusion

Keny’s enquiry shows that early Buddhism was non‑theistic and focused on ethics, analysis of consciousness and liberation from craving. Later devotional forms should not obscure the historical Buddha’s silence on metaphysical first causes. Understanding this distinction allows scholars to appreciate Buddhism’s unique contribution to world philosophy without forcing it into a theistic or atheistic framework.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.