Browse articles

A Mechanistic View of the Jaina Omniscience (Kevala-jnana)

By S. Gajapathi

Vol. 4 · No. 1July 1969pp. 6-11English

Summary

In this thought‑provoking article, S. Gajapathi attempts to reconcile the Jain doctrine of kevalajnana (omniscience) with a mechanistic worldview. Jainism teaches that every soul inherently possesses infinite knowledge, but karmic matter obscures this omniscience. When the soul becomes free of karma, it attains kevalajnana and perceives all substances, qualities and modes directly and simultaneously. Skeptics argue that such instantaneous, infinite knowledge is implausible. Gajapathi addresses their objections using analogies from physics and wave theory. He compares the omniscient soul to a system of stationary waves; in a string fixed at both ends, each point oscillates yet remains part of the whole pattern. Likewise, when karmic obstructions are removed, consciousness resonates with the entire cosmos, allowing the Tirthankara to know all without violating causal laws. Drawing on concepts from acoustics, electronics and systems theory, he argues that complex systems exhibit emergent properties that cannot be reduced to local interactions, suggesting that kevalajnana is the emergent property of a purified consciousness. Gajapathi critiques interpretations that treat omniscience as supernatural, stressing that Jain philosophers describe it as the natural state of the soul when freed from karma. He also engages with Indian philosophical debates, noting that Nyaya and Buddhist thinkers questioned omniscience, while Jain texts responded with sophisticated epistemology. The article emphasises that omniscience does not mean infinite verbal articulation but the direct, non‑symbolic apprehension of reality. Moreover, kevalajnana is non‑absolutist: the omniscient being perceives all perspectives but expresses knowledge through the syadvada (doctrine of conditioned predication). Gajapathi concludes that the Jain doctrine, when interpreted through the lens of modern science, remains intellectually defensible and invites further interdisciplinary dialogue. By blending traditional metaphysics with scientific analogies, he aims to make kevalajnana intelligible to modern readers and to show that ancient Indian insights can enrich contemporary philosophy of mind.

Conclusion

Gajapathi’s mechanistic interpretation reframes kevalajnana as the natural emergent state of an unconditioned consciousness rather than a miraculous faculty. By employing analogies from wave physics and systems theory, he bridges Jain metaphysics and modern science, illustrating that omniscience remains conceptually coherent when viewed as resonance between the liberated soul and the universe.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.