Browse articles

शीलन

Vol. 49 · No. 06June - 2001pp. 41-42Hindi

Summary

A young girl asks, "Why is there enthusiasm in apologizing for a mistake? I feel ashamed. Then why do people say one should not feel ashamed?" Gandhi ji wrote in response, "Making a mistake is a flaw, and one should feel ashamed of it. However, apologizing for a mistake is a good deed, so why should there be shame in that? The meaning of apologizing is the determination not to repeat the mistake. Why should there be shame in making such a determination?" This exchange reflects a profound lesson on the nature of mistakes and apologies. Gandhi ji distinguishes between the act of committing an error, which warrants a sense of shame as it is a flaw, and the act of seeking forgiveness, which is virtuous and should be free from shame. The apology is not merely an admission of fault but a commitment to improvement and change. The phrase "agni kund mein khila gulab" (a rose blooming in a fire pit) is also referenced, suggesting that beauty and goodness can emerge even from intense trials or difficult circumstances. This metaphor reinforces the idea that a sincere apology, born from the fire of one's mistake, can blossom into a positive resolution. The core message is that while the mistake itself is regrettable, the courage to apologize and resolve to do better is commendable and should be embraced without the burden of shame. This teaching encourages a constructive approach to personal failings, focusing on growth and rectification rather than dwelling in embarrassment.

Conclusion

The document's dialogue between a child and Gandhi reveals a profound insight into the psychology of apology and moral growth. The child's confusion—feeling shame for apologizing—is reframed by Gandhi as a misunderstanding of the act's purpose. The implication is that shame should accompany the mistake itself, not the rectification. The outcome of this perspective is a healthier, more constructive approach to accountability: apologizing becomes an act of strength and resolve, not humiliation. By separating the shame of the error from the courage of the apology, the text suggests that true moral development lies in the commitment to not repeat the mistake. This reframing has practical implications for education and personal relationships, encouraging a culture where admitting fault is seen as a step toward improvement rather than a source of enduring embarrassment.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.