Browse articles

आध्यात्मिक संगठन और मर्यादा

Vol. 54 · No. 02February - 2006pp. 37-38Hindi

Summary

The text discusses the distinction between "maryada" (discipline or moral code) and law, emphasizing that while both aim to establish discipline, their foundations differ fundamentally. Maryada arises from faith and devotion, voluntarily accepted, whereas law is externally imposed and rooted in fear and pressure. Maryada is inherently spiritual, focused on purity and self-welfare, and lacks pretense. Without spirituality, maryada degenerates into mere law, failing to achieve its intended outcome. The text highlights the teachings of Acharya Bhikshu, founder of the Terapanth sect, who established maryadas to uphold justice, equanimity, and equitable distribution within the religious order. He abolished the disciple tradition, viewing it as a form of attachment, and emphasized that individualism, selfishness, and rights-based attitudes are inappropriate in a spiritual community. Acharya Bhikshu’s life exemplified a blend of resolve and devotion, free from ego. The name "Terapanth" originated from a poet in Jodhpur, but Acharya Bhikshu reinterpreted it spiritually as "your path," signifying devotion to the Tirthankara. The text underscores the relevance of these maryadas in addressing contemporary issues like fragmentation and conflict. It also recounts the story of Muni Khetsiji, who maintained equanimity when his name was removed from succession for the position of Acharya, demonstrating true detachment. The narrative concludes with a parable about a cowherd and a sage, illustrating how attachment binds the possessor. Acharya Bhikshu stated that the Terapanth order would endure as long as its followers remain vigilant in upholding maryada.

Conclusion

The document underscores that the principles of *maryada* (discipline rooted in spirituality) and law, while both aiming for order, are fundamentally different in origin and essence. The implications are profound: *maryada* must arise from inner spiritual conviction, not external coercion, to be effective. The outcomes demonstrated by Acharya Bhikshu and the Terapanth tradition show that such self-imposed discipline, free from ego, attachment, and the desire for power, can resolve contemporary issues of conflict and tension. By rejecting practices like the guru-disciple system and emphasizing non-attachment, this framework offers a practical path for both monastic and social life. Ultimately, the document concludes that the relevance of these *maryadas* is timeless, providing a sustainable model for harmony and spiritual growth when followed with awareness and sincerity.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Bharati

नैतिक-आध्यात्मिक आधार और शिक्षण-प्रशिक्षण

By आचार्यश्री महाप्रज्ञ

July - 2012
Jain Avenue

Jai Jinendra: The Spiritual Salutation of Self-Realization and Liberation

By Pragati Jain

June 2023