Browse articles

Some Obscure Expressions in the Mrcchakatika

By Ram Prakash Poddar

Vol. 1 · No. 4January - 1973pp. 9-13English, Sanskrit/Prakrit

Summary

Some Obscure Expressions in the Mṛcchakaṭikā addresses unresolved linguistic problems in Śūdraka’s classical Sanskrit drama. R.P. Poddar observes that translators and commentators have long struggled with certain phrases, particularly those containing Prakritised or colloquial words. He selects representative examples and proposes new explanations based on philology and context. In Act I Śakāra sends a message to Cārudatta through the clown and asks him to recite a verse; Poddar examines the instruction “kathesva ghaṭitvā” and argues that commentators misread the compound, suggesting it denotes ‘hymn with praise’ rather than ‘beyond cunning.’ He then analyses terms used in the dice‑game, noting that archaic words like kālo, pañca, cri and ātra denote four, three and two points respectively and that commentators have confused lucky and unlucky throws. By consulting the Bhāṣya and Prakrit grammars he explains the popular metathesis in words such as śīṇa → sīṇa and shows how assimilation produced forms misinterpreted in manuscripts. Poddar also discusses a stanza where Saṁvāhaka vows to renounce gambling and become a Buddhist monk; he demonstrates that the word usually translated as ‘neatly shaved’ actually means ‘bald‑chested,’ drawing on analogous expressions from Buddhist texts. Throughout the article he scrutinises printed editions of the Mṛcchakaṭikā, variant manuscript readings and earlier commentaries. He finds that many obscure expressions result from scribal errors or over‑Sanskritisation of Prakrit originals. By restoring the likely Prakrit forms and offering sensible semantic parallels he clarifies the meaning of difficult passages. His work underscores the importance of comparing multiple manuscripts, recognising phonetic transformations between Sanskrit and Prakrit, and consulting related literature when editing classical plays.

Conclusion

Poddar concludes that many puzzling lines in the Mṛcchakaṭikā can be resolved through careful philological work. By examining etymology, Prakrit equivalents and manuscript variants he demonstrates that seemingly obscure expressions often have straightforward meanings. His analysis encourages editors and translators to adopt a more critical and linguistically informed approach when working with classical Sanskrit dramas, especially those heavily influenced by colloquial speech.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.