Browse articles

The Problems of Ethics and Karma Doctrine as treated in the Bhagvati Sutra

By Krishna Kumar Dixit

Vol. 2 · No. 3October 1973pp. 1-13English

Summary

1. Early Jain Ideal Initially, Jainism maintained that only monks could attain mokṣa (liberation). The most devout householders could only hope for rebirth in heaven, not liberation. Even monks who failed to meet the strict ideal were believed to be reborn in heavenly realms rather than achieve mokṣa. 2. Change in Religious Character Bhagavatī stories often depict devoted disciples (usually monks, sometimes householders) gaining heavenly birth through merit — reflecting a shift in focus. Early Jainism’s strong renunciatory ethic contrasted with contemporary Vedic religion, which emphasized worldly success through yajñas (sacrifices). This contrast partly reflected social tensions between wealthy, powerful classes and the dispossessed — inspiring reform movements like Jainism and Buddhism. 3. From Social Protest to Purely Religious Movement In its earliest phase, Jainism was a protest movement against socio-economic injustice, cloaked in spiritual language. By the time of Aśoka: The state began ensuring protection for the poor (dasa-bhṛtakas in inscriptions). Religious sects, both Brahmanical and monastic, became focused mainly on supra-mundane goals rather than social reform. Monastic sects then also began to praise pious householders — though promising them only heaven, not liberation. 4. Rise of Mythology & Householder Ethics Jain authors became increasingly preoccupied with: Mythology involving gods and goddesses. Edifying stories for semi-educated householders. This produced a large body of narrative literature, especially in the Bhagavatī and five Aṅga texts that are story collections. These story-collections are considered later compositions, not the work of Mahavira’s immediate disciples, despite later tradition claiming otherwise. 5. Implications for Ethics & Karma The shift meant: A monk’s ethical code remained the highest ideal, but householders received more attention in religious instruction. Merit and heavenly rebirth became common spiritual goals, even for monks, unless they met the perfect ascetic standard. Karma theory was increasingly presented through didactic stories rather than purely doctrinal expositions.

Conclusion

Jainism evolved from a radical social protest rooted in strict monastic liberation ideals to a more inclusive religious system that embraced householders through mythology and ethical teachings, balancing ascetic ideals with accessible spiritual goals like heavenly rebirth.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.