Identification of Vamadeva of Kalacuri Inscriptions
By V. V. Mirashi
Summary
V. V. Mirashi’s epigraphic study resolves a longstanding debate about the Kalacuri figure known as Vāmadeva. Comparing a wide range of copper‑plate charters and stone inscriptions, Mirashi shows that references to a mysterious Vāmadeva in grants from Vidisa, Ankusha and Gujarat actually pertain to a local feudatory of the Early Cālukya kings rather than to the better‑known Paramāra ruler of the same name. The article analyses palaeographic details and titulature to date the charters between A.D. 520 and 570. It points out that the titles mahābhujadhipati and paramēśvara used for Vāmadeva were typical of Cālukya vassals and that genealogical phrases in the Kharat plate contradict identification with the later Paramāra line. Mirashi also discusses land grants made by Vāmadeva near Ujjain and notes that their recipients included Buddhist monks and Brāhmaṇs, indicating religious tolerance. By reconstructing family ties and regional politics, he argues that Vāmadeva likely ruled a small principality in Malwa under Cālukya suzerainty and that his domain soon passed to later Kalacuris. The article thus refines the chronology of western Indian dynasties and demonstrates how careful philological analysis of fragmentary inscriptions can correct mistaken identifications. In doing so it provides a model for using epigraphy to piece together early Indian political history.
Conclusion
Through close reading of stray copper‑plate charters, Mirashi establishes that Vāmadeva was a minor sixth‑century feudatory who served the Early Cālukyas. His use of royal titles reflects contemporary epigraphic convention rather than independent sovereignty, and his grants illuminate the network of local chiefs that linked Malwa, Vidarbha and Gujarat. Correctly identifying such figures helps refine early medieval chronology and cautions against equating similarly named rulers without adequate evidence.