Nasar‑ud‑Din Khusru Shah

Summary

The paper reassesses the enigmatic figure of Nasar‑ud‑Din Khusru Shah, who briefly ruled Delhi after assassinating Sultan Qutb‑ud‑Din Mubarak Shah in 1320. Earlier chroniclers portrayed Khusru as a low‑caste Parwari from Gujarat who bewitched his master, but the author argues that new sources—Amir Khusrau’s “Tughlaq‑Nāma”, Yahyā’s “Tārīkh‑i‑Mubārak‑Shāhī” and Isami’s “Futūh‑us‑Salāṭīn”—allow a more nuanced reconstruction. Khusru was likely a Hindu Baradu captured during Ala‑ud‑Din Khalji’s campaigns in Malwa and converted to Islam. Through ability and charisma he rose from Malik Shādi’s retinue to become commander‑in‑chief and vizier under Mubarak; he oversaw the release of thousands of prisoners, abolished oppressive taxes and restored social freedoms, helping stabilise a vast empire from Gujarat to the south despite rebellions. Khusru relied on kinsmen from Gujarat, who formed a martial bodyguard and enabled him to quell challenges. Disgusted by Mubarak’s debauchery and perhaps fearing for his own position, he conspired with disaffected nobles and in April 1320 murdered the sultan, wiping out Ala‑ud‑Din’s heirs and seizing the throne. His reign, variously reported as lasting between five months and over a year, was marked by continued intrigue: while he adopted regal titles, many Muslims resented a ruler of slave origin, and accounts of his supposed apostasy may reflect this prejudice. Ultimately Khusru was defeated and executed by Ghiyāth‑ud‑Din Tughlaq, who founded the Tughlaq dynasty. The article emphasises that Khusru’s administrative skill, military successes in Gujarat and the Deccan, and his role in dismantling Ala‑ud‑Din’s totalitarian system, deserve recognition alongside his notorious coup. By comparing sources, the author shows that stories of his rise from “pariah” to king were coloured by later writers’ moralising and communal biases.