Browse articles

Banerji on Sakas and Kusanas

By Sten Konow

Vol. 14 · No. 1March - 1938pp. 137-152English

Summary

The article Banerji on Sakas and Kusanas evaluates the historian R. D. Banerji’s contributions to the study of the Saka and Kusana dynasties. Banerji a pioneer of Indian archaeology and epigraphy offered influential theories on the chronology and cultural impact of these Central Asian rulers who established kingdoms in India during the first centuries CE. The article summarises Banerji’s views on the origins of the Sakas Scythians and their migrations into northwestern India. He argued that Saka rule under kings like Maues and Azes introduced new coins artistic motifs and military practices blending Central Asian and Hellenistic influences. The paper also reviews Banerji’s interpretation of the Kusanas noting his analysis of the Rabatak inscription and the portraits of kings like Kujula Kadphises Vima Takto Vima Kadphises and Kanishka. Banerji emphasised the role of the Kusanas in promoting Mahayana Buddhism and in fostering a cosmopolitan culture that linked India with Bactria Gandhara and the Roman world. The author of the article assesses Banerji’s methods acknowledging his meticulous examination of coinage and inscriptions while also pointing out where his conclusions have been revised by later discoveries. For example Banerji proposed a particular order of succession among Kusana kings that has since been adjusted in light of new evidence. The article highlights his assertion that the so called Saka era was actually inaugurated by a Western Kshatrapa ruler a theory that remains debated. Overall the study appreciates Banerji’s pioneering role and encourages further research to clarify remaining chronological problems and to integrate archaeological numismatic and textual data.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that while some of R. D. Banerji’s hypotheses regarding the Sakas and Kusanas have been superseded his broader contributions remain foundational. He drew attention to neglected sources stimulated debate over dynastic chronology and emphasised the importance of material culture in reconstructing history. Reappraising his work demonstrates both the progress of scholarship and the enduring value of early investigators. Future studies should refine the chronology of these dynasties and explore their cultural interactions to deepen our understanding of the early historic period.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.