Doctrines of the Mahāsāṃghika School of Buddhism
By Nalinaksha Dutt
Summary
The Mahāsāṃghika school, the earliest Buddhist sect to secede from the original community (later known as Theravāda or Sthaviravāda), emerged during the Second Buddhist Council at Vesali. While traditionally attributed to disputes over Vinaya rule interpretations, scholars suggest doctrinal differences predated the split. The Mahāsāṃghikas further divided into sub-schools, including Ekavyavahārika, Lokottaravāda, Kāyaka, Balmṛtika, and Sthaviravāda. Key doctrines, derived from Vasumitra’s treatise and the Kathāvatthu, include: 1. **Buddha’s Nature**: The Buddha was transcendent (loka-uttara), existing beyond human realms, with a body composed of pure, unchanging dharmas (e.g., sila, samadhi) rather than physical form. His teachings were delivered through created images, not a historical person. 2. **Dharma and Sanyata**: Some sub-schools emphasized Dharmakaya (the Buddha’s essence as ultimate reality) and Sanyata (emptiness), evolving concepts among later Mahāsāṃghika groups like the Uttarapathakas. 3. **Heterodoxy**: The Theravada criticized Mahāsāṃghika views as heretical, particularly their denial of the Buddha’s earthly existence and conventional compassion (karuṇā). The Mahāsāṃghika doctrines, preserved in Vasumitra’s Chinese-translated work and corroborated by the Kathāvatthu, highlight early Buddhist doctrinal diversity and the development
Conclusion
The analysis of Vasumitra’s treatise and the Kathavatthu reveals the Mahāsāṃghika school’s doctrinal distinctions through comparative frameworks, emphasizing their departure from early Buddhist orthodoxy. These texts, validated by their mutual corroboration, highlight controversies over the Buddha’s transcendence, the nature of dharmas, and the interpretation of Vinaya rules. The Mahāsāṃghikas’ sub-schools further diversified these positions, reflecting early Buddhism’s dynamic evolution. This study underscores the significance of these sources in reconstructing sectarian debates, offering a nuanced understanding of doctrinal development in ancient Buddhism. Their enduring scholarly value lies in illuminating the intellectual and philosophical currents that shaped later Buddhist traditions.