Browse articles

Reviews

By Chintaharan Chakravarti

Vol. 5 · No. 3September - 1929pp. 578-581English

Summary

The third volume of *Jain Inscriptions, Jaisalmer*, compiled by Puran Chand Nahar, adds 2592 inscriptions to the series, totaling nearly three thousand records. Published in 1929, it focuses on Jaisalmer, a significant Jain stronghold, with inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and Hindi covering diverse subjects rarely found in epigraphic records. While valuable for linguistic, social, and religious scholarship, the work lacks explanatory notes for terms unclear to non-specialists, and some errors persist, such as misreadings from plates (e.g., No. 2531) and uncorrected engraver mistakes (e.g., "ન: મૈપામ્" instead of "WA"). Critics note Nahar’s failure to address prior critiques, including discrepancies in deciphering, though he attributes some errors to proofreaders. Despite these flaws, the work is acknowledged as a significant contribution, particularly given Nahar’s blindness during its completion. The *Chintaharan Chakravarti Inscriptions of Bengal* (Vol. III), edited by Nanigopal Majumdar (1929), compiles 119 inscriptions from the Candras, Varmanas, and Isvara-gharasa periods, continuing the Varendra Research Society’s series. Majumdar rigorously cross-checked readings against original plates and corrected prior errors, while providing detailed notes and a glossary of official titles. However, some inaccuracies remain, such as the incorrect attribution of Vijayapura’s mention in Dhoyi’s text and overinterpretations (e.g., equating *draméha* with *dlaméka*). The work consolid

Conclusion

This comprehensive review highlights two significant epigraphic collections—Jain inscriptions from Jaisalmer and Chintaharan Chakravarti inscriptions of Bengal—showcasing their distinct contributions and limitations. Puran Chand Nahar’s compilation of nearly three thousand Jain inscriptions provides valuable linguistic, social, and religious data but lacks explanatory notes for non-specialists. Despite editorial inconsistencies, the work remains a monumental achievement, especially given the author’s visual impairment. Meanwhile, Nanigopal Majumdar’s meticulously edited Bengal inscriptions offer post-Gupta records in an accessible format, correcting prior errors and including a glossary of titles. While both works are praised for their scholarly rigor and accessibility, they cater to specialized audiences, with Nahar’s Hindi-focused approach and Majumdar’s shift to English notes enhancing broader utility. These collections underscore the importance of epigraphy in understanding regional histories and cultural dynamics, serving as critical resources for scholars despite their unique limitations.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review – The Doctrine of the Jainas

By Unexhibited

April - 1979
Vedanta Kesari

Book Review

By Nivedita Raghunath Bhide

Feb 2023
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Sri Mahavir Jaina Vidyalaya Golden Jubilee Volume (Review)

By Unexhibited

July 1970
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Review: Buddha Purva Ka Bharatiya Itihasa (Part I)

By Ramashankar Tripathi

Deceber - 1942
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review

By Kastur Chand Lalwani

April 1975
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Jitendra Nath Banerjee

September - 1932