Book Review
By Kastur Chand Lalwani
Summary
The Book Review section evaluates three works that illuminate the diversity of modern Jain scholarship. The first review considers Padmanabha S. Jaini’s "The Jaina Path of Purification". Aimed at general readers, Jaini’s book includes extensive canonical and commentarial material to compensate for the scarcity of such texts outside India. The reviewer appreciates this erudition but notes that the title’s allusion to the Buddhist "middle path" could mislead readers into thinking the author advocates a middle way between extremes. The reviewer stresses that the Jaina path elevates life through a disciplined eight‑fold programme and emphasises purification of the soul rather than the negation of life. Because Western audiences often encounter Jainism through Buddhist lenses, the reviewer fears that the title reinforces the misconception that Jainism is merely a Buddhist offshoot. Another criticism is that Jaini’s opening vignette describing a Jain monk’s self‑immolation may sensationalise Jain asceticism; most monks do not seek death, and the reviewer argues that presenting such examples risks creating a distorted image of Jain practice. The review nonetheless commends Jaini for treating both major Jain sects—Śvetāmbara and Digambara—equally and for translating and summarising source texts fairly. The second review examines K. C. Kasliwal’s "Poet Buchraj and His Contemporary Poets", which explores the contributions of medieval Hindi and Rajasthani poet Buchraj. Kasliwal reconstructs Buchraj’s biography, contextualises his devotional verses within Jain lay culture and compares his work with that of his contemporaries. The reviewer applauds the documentation of Jain vernacular literature and the inclusion of lesser‑known poets but suggests that the book could have offered more critical analysis and broader historical context. The third review discusses Sadhvi Sanghamitra’s "Influential Ācāryas in Jaina Religion", a biographical compendium of major Jain teachers. Each chapter outlines an acharya’s life, teachings and institutional contributions. The reviewer values the accessible prose and the attempt to highlight the human agents behind doctrinal developments but notes that some sketches are brief and would benefit from deeper analysis. Overall, the Book Review section recommends these works for scholars and lay readers while encouraging critical engagement.
Conclusion
Taken together, the three books reviewed showcase the dynamism of Jain studies. Jaini’s work combines accessible prose with primary sources, though its title and anecdotal opening may mislead Western audiences. Kasliwal’s study brings attention to neglected vernacular poets, albeit with limited critical depth, and Sanghamitra’s sketches make the achievements of influential acharyas approachable. Despite their flaws, all three volumes enrich understanding of Jain doctrine, literature and history and merit reading for anyone interested in the Jain tradition.