Browse articles

बुद्धिजीवी

Vol. 49 · No. 11November - 2001pp. 36-41Hindi

Summary

The text presents a detailed, observational narrative about a man described as an unusual intellectual and idealist, observed daily between noon and one on a path. The narrator instructs the reader to watch him closely without being noticed, emphasizing that he carries an invisible burden, like countless souls he can neither bear nor set down. The man is seen interacting with his environment in a peculiar, seemingly unmotivated manner: he plucks a mango leaf, caresses it, and eats it; he sits by a tree, smiling inexplicably. He is surrounded by cows and buffaloes but appears to be looking at himself rather than them. The narrator recounts a conversation where the man explains that a person’s deepest loneliness can only be shared with an animal, not another human, because an animal does not impose expectations or threaten one’s consciousness. The man is a teacher at the same rural school as the narrator and lives next door, though they rarely visit each other. The narrator describes his erratic walking style, suggesting he has no single personality but contains multiple persons within him. He once worked at St. Xavier’s College but left, claiming he was bored and disgusted with the artificial, secure life of a professor, preferring the village despite calling it another kind of hell. The narrator admits to feeling a strange fear of the man’s laughter and an inability to approach him, as if a magical line prevented it. The man later visits the narrator after months and tells a story about a close friend who married disastrously, leading the narrator to advise the friend’s wife to seek divorce because the friend could not live without a woman while she could. A year after the divorce, the friend writes that he has abandoned plans to remarry, realizing that true life begins only by rising above personal expectations.

Conclusion

This narrative reveals the profound isolation of an intellectual who, despite being surrounded by people and engaging in social performances, remains fundamentally disconnected. The observer’s fixation on the subject’s every gesture—from his shifting gaits to his silent communion with nature—underscores a deeper commentary on the impossibility of truly knowing another person. The story’s implications suggest that modern existence, particularly for the thinking individual, is marked by an irreducible solitude that no relationship, whether marital or platonic, can fully bridge. The protagonist’s rejection of conventional professional and domestic life, his preference for the company of animals over humans, and his cryptic philosophy about bearing invisible burdens all point to a quiet rebellion against societal expectations. Ultimately, the document implies that authentic selfhood may require embracing this very alienation, finding freedom not in connection but in the acceptance of one’s essential strangeness to others and even to oneself.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.