139 वां तेरापंथ मर्यादा महोत्सव मेरं शरणं गच्छामि
Summary
The text discusses the concept of "maryada" (discipline/restraint) and its importance for institutions, using the Terapanth religious order as a primary example. It argues that contemporary society often views maryada negatively, as a meaningless restriction that imprisons life's pleasures and freedom. However, the text contends that maryada is actually a protective shield for humanity, safeguarding life from uncontrolled materialistic tendencies. A strong system of discipline is essential for any institution's development and longevity; without it, an organization is like a building with a weak foundation, prone to collapse. Many institutions fail because initial unity and cooperation dissolve as members develop excessive ambition, desire for power, and selfishness. In contrast, where self-discipline and adherence to maryada exist, such negative tendencies cannot prevail. The Terapanth order, founded by Acharya Bhikshu, is presented as a model where maryada is central. Acharya Bhikshu's "Maryada Patra" (Code of Discipline) established rules such as all monks and nuns living under one Acharya's command, not creating personal disciples, and avoiding factionalism. These principles are credited with the order's enduring strength and unity. The text distinguishes maryada from law: law is externally imposed and uses punishment, which can suppress but not transform the heart. Maryada, conversely, is internally accepted and works through heart-change, promoting self-control. It is not a bondage but a system of coexistence and equitable sharing (sambhivag), as practiced in Terapanth where all members, regardless of seniority, have equal rights. The text concludes that the revival of an ideal society (Ramrajya) is possible only through a transformation of attitude, embracing maryada and the principle of seeking refuge in discipline.
Conclusion
The document underscores that discipline and restraint are not bonds but essential safeguards for individual and institutional vitality. It argues that organizations falter when self-discipline erodes, giving way to ego and ambition, while those rooted in voluntary adherence to ethical limits achieve lasting stability. The Terapanth tradition exemplifies how internalized restraint fosters cooperation and prevents fragmentation. A key implication is that external laws alone cannot transform behavior; only heartfelt commitment to self-discipline can address modern crises like violence and resource depletion. The text suggests that reviving such principled living could enable a more harmonious society, where mutual respect replaces conflict. Ultimately, the document presents self-imposed discipline as a practical foundation for both personal fulfillment and sustainable collective progress.