भोगो, पर त्याग से

Summary

The text critiques the gap between ancient Indian philosophical ideals and contemporary practice. It argues that while Indians pride themselves on a civilization that is both ancient and great, this greatness is only invoked during speeches, worship, or praise, and is not lived in daily life. The author contends that from time immemorial, religious scriptures like the Vedas have repeatedly called for living for others. The Rigveda is cited as stating that one who eats alone is a sinner. The Ishavasya Upanishad, part of the Yajurveda, is referenced for its teaching that the entire universe is pervaded by the divine, and one should enjoy through renunciation, not covet another’s wealth. The text laments that while such authoritative statements are frequently spoken, there is no courage to apply them in life. Words have been grasped, but their meaning, which is meant to be conveyed, is never truly understood or implemented. The current age is described as one of rush and self-importance, where the self is paramount, contradicting the teachings of all philosophers and saints who have always spoken of altruism. Tulsidas’s saying that there is no dharma greater than benefiting others is noted as being buried in the mind. The text points to a stark contrast: black money worth billions lies stored in bags in some homes, while nearly sixty percent of the population lives below the poverty line. It concludes that the tradition of equality, meaning equal rights for all, has been upheld only in words, not in practice, and that saints have consistently taught to have just enough for one’s family so that neither oneself nor a holy person goes hungry.