Place of Suicide in Indian Culture and Religions

Summary

The article 'Place of Suicide in Indian Culture and Religions' explores how Indian traditions differentiate between self-inflicted death motivated by despair and voluntary self-sacrifice undertaken for religious or social reasons. The author begins by noting that suicide is a universal human phenomenon and that its causes—disappointment in love, jealousy, fear, shame or wounded pride—are similar across civilizationsfile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=JAIN%20JOURNAL%20by%20one%E2%80%99s%20self,falling%20headlong. He emphasizes that Indian religious literature uses the Sanskrit term ātmaghāta in two senses: it can mean suicide motivated by melancholy or worldly distress, and it can refer to self-sacrifice for a higher causefile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=All%20contributions%2C%20which%20must%20be,00%20for%20one%20year. Indian culture restricts the word suicide to the former, whereas a range of religiously sanctioned voluntary deaths—such as mahāprasthāna (the great journey), prayopavesana (fasting unto death), jalasamadhi (ritual drowning), agnipraveśa (self-immolation in fire), bhūmypatana (falling from a cliff), sati and jauhar—are considered acts of self-sacrificefile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=Indian%20culture%20and%20religions%20viz,falling%20headlong. The paper analyzes texts from Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism to show that ordinary suicide is condemned by all three traditions. The Īśāvasya Upaniṣad warns that those who destroy themselves will wander in sunless darknessfile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=Yajneshwar%20S,Sastra%2060, and Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra prescribes that self-murderers be dragged through public streets and deprived of funeral ritesfile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=repetitions%20of%20situations%20which%20bring,drive%20a%20person%20to%20end. Yet the author argues that religiously motivated self-immolations are not classed as suicides because the intention is not despair but renunciation or heroism. He notes that Indian society traditionally revered acts like sati and jauhar as expressions of chastity, honour and community solidarity, although they are controversial today. The article gives special attention to the Jain vow of sallekhana, a disciplined fast to death undertaken at the end of life. Citing Upendra Thakur and Jaina scriptures, the author insists that sallekhana is not a form of suicide but a final act of non-attachment undertaken with the guidance of a spiritual preceptor. Similarly, Buddhist Jātakas celebrate bodhisattvas who willingly sacrifice their lives to feed hungry animals or to obtain the Dharma, praising such acts as selflessness rather than self-destruction. In conclusion, the paper urges scholars to use the term ‘suicide’ only for deaths motivated by weakness or frustration. Religious self-sacrifices, although they involve voluntary death, are framed in Indian thought as acts of courage, purification and spiritual achievementfile:///home/oai/share/jain_journal_1987_10_520088_hr6_ocred.pdf#:~:text=All%20contributions%2C%20which%20must%20be,00%20for%20one%20year. By examining classical texts and social practices, the author shows that Indian religions’ nuanced view of voluntary death complicates the modern understanding of suicide.