Browse articles

श्रम, शरीर और मन

Vol. 59 · No. 05May - 2011pp. 7-8Hindi

Summary

The text discusses the nature of labor, arguing that it is a mistake to view physical labor as inferior to mental labor. Mahatma Gandhi emphasized physical labor in his eleven vows not to create competition between the two, but to prevent physical labor from being considered secondary. Both forms of labor are complementary and equal. However, society has historically undervalued physical labor, leading to excessive reliance on machines. Machines, like washing machines or mixers, lack discernment and cannot adjust for quality or precision, unlike human intelligence and effort. Gandhi was not opposed to all machines but only those that diminish natural human labor capacity; he considered items like glasses, watches, and the spinning wheel as machines. He also opposed monotonous physical labor and did not oppose sewing machines, which require a blend of body, mind, and intellect. A story illustrates this: a gardener patiently nurtures a fig tree for a year, using his understanding and effort to produce fruit, while the owner lacked this knowledge. The tale shows that physical labor, mind, and intellect are an integrated pair, with neither superior. All labor involves both body and mind proportionally. Patience is key, as labor’s fruits require time. Machines operate without understanding, controlled by human hands and brain. The brain, hands, and legs together constitute meaningful labor. Machines that disrupt this balance promote luxury, not labor. Gandhi’s vow of physical labor aimed to curb unchecked luxury, which the world suffers from today. Jain principles of non-violence and non-possessiveness prohibit exploitation, thereby honoring labor. Acharya Mahaprajna believes all human discoveries result from labor and effort, and that dedication to labor should be a core part of lifestyle. On World Labor Day, the call for worker unity should also emphasize making labor dedication central to life.

Conclusion

The document argues that physical labor and mental work are not in competition but are complementary and equally valuable, challenging the societal tendency to devalue manual work. It warns against the overuse of machines, which can diminish both physical skill and intellectual engagement, leading to a loss of human judgment and creativity. The text emphasizes that meaningful labor requires the integration of body, mind, and intellect, as illustrated by the gardener’s patience and wisdom in nurturing a fig tree. The implications are clear: a sustainable and ethical society must restore dignity to all forms of work, resist the lure of mechanized convenience that fosters exploitation and luxury, and adopt a lifestyle rooted in diligence and non-exploitation, as advocated by Gandhi and Jain philosophy.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.