Iconographic Features of the Sixteen Jaina Mahavidyas as Enunciated in the Iconographic Texts
By Maruti Nandan Prasad Tiwari
Summary
Maruti Nandan Prasad Tiwari’s article surveys the iconography of the sixteen Jaina Mahāvidyās, goddesses who embody esoteric knowledge and serve as spiritual aides to Tīrthaṅkaras. While the Jaina tradition is often seen as austere, it developed a rich pantheon of guardians and knowledge deities, especially in the medieval period. Drawing primarily on Sanskrit iconographic manuals such as the Pratiṣṭhā‑sāroddhāra, Āgama‑darpana and the Śrī‑Prakaraṇa, Tiwari catalogues the physical attributes, hand gestures (mudrās), mounts (vāhanas) and symbolic implements of each goddess. The sixteen Mahāvidyās include Sarasvatī (goddess of learning), Bṛhatsrī, Rohiṇī, Prajñāpāramitā and others less familiar outside Jaina circles such as Vajrāṅkuśī and Nāradā. The article notes that each goddess typically has four arms, though some are depicted with two or eight. Their attributes range from manuscripts and rosaries signifying learning to nooses, goads and lotus flowers symbolising control over passions. Tiwari compares depictions in Digambara and Śvetāmbara texts, highlighting variations: for instance, Digambara texts describe Rohiṇī as seated on a lotus with a sword and shield, whereas Śvetāmbara sources assign her a parrot and vina. The author also situates these iconographic prescriptions within the broader context of Indian goddess worship. He notes overlaps with the Hindu Mahāvidyās and the Buddhist Prajñāpāramitā, suggesting a shared pool of symbols. At the same time, Jaina texts often reinterpret these goddesses within a non‑theistic framework: the Mahāvidyās are not objects of ultimate devotion but protectors who help aspirants overcome obstacles on the path to liberation. Tiwari further comments on the role of these goddesses in temple rituals and festival processions, and provides references to sculptural examples from Gujarat and Rajasthan. By bringing together textual prescriptions and material evidence, the article demonstrates that the visual programme of Jaina temples was not arbitrary but grounded in a sophisticated iconographic system. This system balanced the desire to incorporate popular goddess cults with the doctrinal imperative of non‑theistic devotion.
Conclusion
Tiwari’s survey of the sixteen Jaina Mahāvidyās clarifies the attributes and symbolism of these enigmatic deities and situates them within the broader landscape of Indian goddess iconography. Recognizing both the borrowings from and the distinctive adaptations of parallel Hindu and Buddhist traditions allows for a better appreciation of Jaina temple art. The article serves as a valuable resource for historians, art historians and devotees interested in the evolution of Jaina visual culture.