Browse articles

Buddha and Asceticism

By U. Dhammaratana

Vol. 33 · No. 2June - 1957pp. 129-138English

Summary

In this essay U. Dhammaratana examines the Buddha’s stance on asceticism. He notes that in early India extreme ascetic practices often involved indecencies: in the Kukkuravatika Sutta two ascetics adopted the behaviour of a dog and a pig, prompting the Buddha to warn that those who imitate animals are reborn as animalsfile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=Buddha%20and%20Asceticism%20137%20Another,give%20%E0%AA%98%E0%AA%A1%20an%20idea%20of. Dhammaratana cites passages from the Majjhima Nikāya to show that the Buddha rejected both sensual indulgence and self‑mortification and instead taught the Middle Way. When the Buddha recovered from severe fasting before his enlightenment, he realised that a healthy mind requires a healthy body and that moral culture is more important than physical austerity. The article emphasises that the Buddha did not encourage ascetics to embrace the opposite extreme of luxury; rather, he advocated simple living with strict moral disciplinefile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=When%20we%20say%20that%20the,healthy%20body%20and%20vice%20versa. The monastic code contains rules to regulate behaviour but does not mandate ascetic devices. Dhammaratana points out that the Buddha recognised an “ascetic temperament” and permitted dhutaṅgas—thirteen optional austerities such as wearing coarse robes, living at the foot of a tree or eating only from alms—yet these practices were to be voluntary and never advertisedfile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=been%20recommended%20for%20their%20benefit,by%20a%20member%20%E0%AB%A6%E0%AB%AA%E0%AB%AF%E0%AB%A9%20without. According to the Mahāsakuladāyin Sutta, when Udayī praised the Buddha’s simplicity, the Buddha replied that disciples like Mahākassapa, who practised all thirteen dhutaṅgas, surpassed him in austerity; his own reputation rested on his achievements in morality (sīla), concentration (samādhi) and wisdom (paññā)file:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=life%20of%20heliness%2C%20purity%20and,cetovimutti%20or%20that%20liberation%20of. The article concludes with canonical stanzas that reject nakedness, matted hair, fasting and other mortifications as purifiersfile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=na%20naggacariyd%20na%20jata%20na,motionless%20do%20not%20purity%20man. True purity lies in cultivating a serene, disciplined mind; even someone wearing fine clothes who harms no being and follows the noble path is a genuine reclusefile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=,bhikkhu. Dhammaratana thus argues that Buddhism allows moderate voluntary asceticism but condemns extreme self‑mortification and emphasises inner transformation over external practices.

Conclusion

The Buddha’s rejection of extreme asceticism rests on his experience that self‑torture does not lead to awakening. Dhammaratana shows that while the Buddha permitted certain voluntary austerities for practitioners inclined towards discipline, he insisted these should be private and subordinate to the cultivation of morality, concentration and insightfile:///home/oai/share/split/buddha_and_asceticism.pdf#:~:text=na%20naggacariyd%20na%20jata%20na,bhikkhu. The Middle Way emphasises moderation and compassion: purity is attained not by outward mortifications but by controlling the mind and refraining from harming others. This teaching highlights Buddhism’s pragmatic approach to spiritual practice and its focus on internal transformation.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was the Buddha a Theist?

By L. B. Keny

December - 1944