Geographical Data in Panini

Summary

Panini’s Astadhyayi is not merely a grammatical treatise; it is also a rich repository of geographical information. The author’s explanation of place‑names allows historians to reconstruct the political and cultural landscape of early India. He classifies localities by their suffixes and the circumstances that inspired their names—whether they were named after a founder, an agricultural product or another distinctive featurefile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-5-102.pdf. Panini divides the country into various types of regions, distinguishing between monarchies and republics and between northern and eastern provinces such as Madra, Kuru and other Janapadasfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-5-102.pdf. The article stresses that Panini’s geographic horizon was vast; he knew of lands stretching from the Pamirs and Afghanistan through the Punjab down to Kalinga and coastal Suramasa, and he drew a broad division between the Udicya (northern) region and the Pracya (eastern) region with boundaries such as the Sutlej riverfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-5-102.pdf#:~:text=The%20southern%20110016%20%E0%AB%A6%20his,Bharata%2C%20on%20which%20Patafjali. Panini’s catalogue of mountains includes the Himalayan chain and ranges like Tri‑kakut, Vidira and other peaks, while his enumeration of rivers lists major waterways such as the Indus, the Ganga and their tributariesfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-5-102.pdf#:~:text=The%20southern%20110016%20%E0%AB%A6%20his,Bharata%2C%20on%20which%20Patafjali. Through painstaking analysis of Panini’s aphorisms, the author reconstructs an ancient road‑network and identifies towns, forests and tribal republics. The study argues that Panini’s attention to place‑names reflects a society in transition: new settlements were being founded, republics were co‑existing with monarchies and linguistic conventions mirrored social organisation. By correlating Panini’s terminology with archaeological evidence and other texts, the article demonstrates that the Astadhyayi provides reliable data for historical geography and political history of early India. It also highlights Panini’s method of grouping place‑names by grammatical endings, which reveals how peoples conceptualised space. The author concludes that Panini’s work is indispensable to historians seeking to map the early Gangetic world because it preserves names of otherwise forgotten settlements, preserves the memory of tribal alliances and gives insights into the territorial extent of ancient polities.