Browse articles

Jatibheda

By Nalini Nath Das Gupta

Vol. 25 · No. 2June - 1949pp. 146-147English

Summary

In this review, Kshiti Mohan Sen’s book “Jatibheda” (Caste Difference) is assessed. Sen argues that the caste system was not intrinsic to early Aryan society but was borrowed from indigenous communities and gradually became rigid. He notes that while some reformers advocated rights for lower castes, the system often restricted the participation of large segments of society in cultural life. Using sources from ancient, medieval and modern periods, Sen traces the evolution of caste and its social impactfile:///home/oai/share/split_articles/jatibheda.pdf. The reviewer commends the work for its balanced analysis and its relevance to contemporary debates on caste.

Conclusion

The review summarises Sen’s thesis that caste was adopted and hardened over time, limiting social participation. His comprehensive research across historical periods supports his argument, offering valuable insights into caste’s evolution and social consequencesfile:///home/oai/share/split_articles/jatibheda.pdf.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Journal of Indian History and Culture

Rural Social Structure in Orissa (400-1000 AD): Caste and Occupational Groups

By R. C. Misra

September 1997
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was there any conflict between the Brahmins and the Buddhists?

By Y. Krishan

June - 1954
Dharmadoot

Social Engineering in Buddha's Dhamma: Equality and Women in Pali Literature

By Arvind Rituraj

November 2020
Sambodhi

Social Philosophy of Dr. Radhakrishnan

By H. M. Joshi

1989
Journal of Indian History and Culture

Caste System Persistence and Challenges in Modern India

By A. Chandrasekaran

September 2007