A Note on Kicakavadha (reply)
By Chintaharan Chakravarti
Summary
This short note responds to criticisms of the author’s earlier article on the legend of Kīcakavadha – the killing of Kīcaka by Bhīma in the Mahābhārata. The previous article argued that the episode was a later interpolation reflecting sectarian rivalry. In this reply, the author defends his methodology and clarifies that he did not question the antiquity of the entire Virāṭaparvan. He reiterates that linguistic and stylistic differences between the Kīcakavadha narrative and surrounding text suggest that it was composed by a different author. The note also addresses specific textual points raised by a critic, providing alternative readings of certain verses. The author thanks the critic for engaging with his work and invites further discussion. The note is valuable for illustrating scholarly debate and the challenges of reconstructing epic composition.
Conclusion
The reply emphasises that textual criticism of epics requires sensitivity to variations in language and narrative style. By engaging with critiques, the author reaffirms the importance of open scholarly dialogue and encourages ongoing examination of the Mahābhārata’s composite nature.