The Bhagavadajjukiyam
By P. Anujan Achan
Summary
The Bhagavadajjukiyam discusses literary traditions of 7th-century Deccan, focusing on poets like Bharavi (author of Kiratarjuniya) and Dandin, whose works align with inscriptions from the period. It critiques Asokanath Bhattacharya’s analysis of the text’s prologue, arguing his classification of dramatic types (Ripakas, Upariipakas) is flawed. The author emphasizes that traditional sources like Sahitya-darpana specify only ten Ripakas, rejecting attempts to expand this list with terms like Vira or Sallapa, which belong to other dramatic categories. The text also clarifies misinterpretations of Winternitz’s views on identifying the Prahasana’s author, Bodhayana Kavi, with Vrttikara. Separately, P. Anujan describes the discovery of Balpur copper coins linked to Pratapamalla Deva, noting the site’s historical rivalry with Ratanpur and its archaeological significance, including a Brihmi inscription from the 2nd century CE.
Conclusion
The Bhagavadajjukiyam clarifies the historical context of Deccan's 7th-century rulers and literary figures, identifying key poets like Bhiravi and Dandin within a precise chronology. It challenges prior assumptions about the classification of Sanskrit dramatic forms, critically analyzing the categorization of Ripakas and Upariipakas. The study highlights methodological rigor in reconciling textual references with established literary traditions, while exposing inconsistencies in secondary scholarship. By contextualizing the Bhagavadajjukiyam's prologue within broader Sanskrit literary history, this analysis underscores the need for careful source evaluation and contextual accuracy in interpreting classical texts.