Reviews and Nalavilasa-Nataka
By Nalinaksha Dutt, D. Bhattacharya, T. K. Krishna Menon
Summary
The *Nalavilasa-Nataka*, a Sanskrit drama by the 12th-century Jain poet Ramacandra Sari, was first published in 1926 by Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, edited by O. K. Srigondekar and Lalchandra B. Gandhi. The work reimagines the Nala episode from the *Mahabharata*, shifting focus from divine to human agency—introducing characters like Kalahaiisa and Makarika to drive the plot, contrasting with the original’s mythological elements. The poet employs a fluid Vaidarbhi style, praised for its naturalness and humanized narrative, which influenced later works like Somaprabha’s *Kwmarapila-pratibodia*. The drama’s prologue asserts originality, denying dependence on prior sources for theme or language. While the plot follows traditional outlines, it emphasizes psychological realism and probability, distinguishing it from earlier versions. The editors’ Sanskrit introduction provides a comprehensive literary history of the Nala episode, contextualizing the play’s innovations. Separately, Saktibhadra’s *Ascarya-Coudamanti* was edited by C. Sankara Rama Sastri, with an introduction by S. Kuppuswami Sastri, who hailed it as one of the finest Rima-plays, rivaling Bhavabhuti’s *Uttararama-carita*. The author’s true identity remains uncertain—possibly a pseudonym for Sankara, a disciple of the scholar Sankaricirva, who burned his original manuscript after composition. The play’s unique merit lies in its purification through Sankaricirva’s critical oversight during oral recitation. Both works exemplify Kerala
Conclusion
The publication of *Nalavilasa-Nataka* in the Gaekwad’s Oriental Series marks a significant scholarly contribution to the study of Sanskrit drama, particularly for its innovative approach to a classic narrative. While Ramacandra Sari’s work adheres to the traditional *Nala* episode from the *Mahabharata*, it distinguishes itself through humanized storytelling, replacing mythological elements with mortal conflicts and emphasizing psychological realism. The poet’s deliberate departure from conventional artificiality, as noted in the prologue, reflects a conscious effort to enhance narrative engagement and plausibility. The editors, O. K. Srigondekar and Lalchandra B. Gandhi, have provided valuable context through their comprehensive introduction, cataloging the extensive literature on the *Nala* theme and highlighting the play’s unique merits. This edition not only preserves a rare example of Jain literary artistry but also offers critical insights into the evolution of Sanskrit dramatic traditions, making it an indispensable resource for scholars and enthusiasts alike.