Browse articles

पाप-पुण्य : वैदिक अवैदिक विवेचन

Vol. 51 · No. 06June - 2003pp. 13-18Hindi

Summary

The text examines the concept of sin (pāp) and merit (puṇya) within Vedic and Upanishadic philosophy. It states that this duality is fundamental to human action, influencing decisions across all levels of society. In the Vedic period, multiple terms for sin existed, such as āgas and enas, and seven major sins were identified, including theft, violating a guru's bed, and murder. The god Varuṇa is described as the overseer of moral order, with transgression against his will considered sin. The Upanishads, particularly the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, emphasize that a person becomes what they do: good deeds lead to goodness, and sinful deeds lead to sinfulness. This process is driven by desire and intention, not just external actions. The Chāndogya Upaniṣad lists five types of sinners, including those who associate with sinners. The Bhagavad Gītā categorizes demonic qualities like hypocrisy and anger as sinful. The consequences of sin are described as leading to joyless, dark realms, while merit leads to heaven or liberation. Liberation from sin is achieved through self-knowledge, realizing the self (ātman) is identical to ultimate reality (brahman). This knowledge, along with practices like penance and repentance, destroys sin. The text concludes by discussing the state of being beyond sin and merit (pāpapuṇyātītavāda). In this ultimate state, the realized soul transcends all moral distinctions, as actions no longer bind them. This differs from the views of Nietzsche and Bradley, as the Upanishadic concept applies to both the self and ultimate reality, but only after self-realization.

Conclusion

The document establishes that the concepts of sin (pāp) and merit (puṇya) are foundational to human action, serving as a decisive ethical framework that guides individual conduct from the Vedic period onward. It demonstrates that these are not merely abstract philosophical ideas but are deeply embedded in the social and personal conscience, influencing decisions and determining moral outcomes. The analysis reveals a dual outcome: on a practical level, adherence to prescribed duties leads to merit and spiritual elevation, while transgression results in sin and suffering in dark realms. However, the ultimate implication is the transcendence of this duality through self-realization, where the enlightened soul, having understood its identity with Brahman, rises beyond both sin and merit to a state of absolute freedom and liberation.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.