अहिंसा - अनासक्ति

Summary

The text explores the relationship between non-attachment (anāsakti) and non-violence (ahiṃsā), arguing that true non-attachment is meaningful only for an active, capable person, not for one who is inactive or powerless. It references the Bhagavad Gītā’s teaching that one has a right to action but not to its fruits, emphasizing freedom from ego and desire for results. The author notes that Mahatma Gandhi believed non-attachment naturally leads to non-violence, as attachment to outcomes fuels lies and violence. Gandhi clarified that renouncing fruits does not mean neglecting consequences; rather, one must carefully consider means and ends while remaining detached from the outcome. He also stated that actions impossible without attachment, such as killing or lying, should be abandoned entirely. The text then discusses Ācārya Mahāprajña’s views, who argues that non-violence has the power to transform human nature and represents complete freedom. He emphasizes developing compassion and empathy (ātmaupamya) as foundations for non-attachment and non-violence. Mahāprajña advocates for mandatory training in non-violence, similar to military training for violence, suggesting that even a small number of dedicated “peace soldiers” could create a miracle. The text questions whether current educational systems and language, such as the term “soldier” with its violent connotations, are suitable for such training. It concludes that many subtle issues require serious consideration and resolution to build a bridge between non-attachment and non-violence.