Browse articles

आत्मवाद : विविध पहलू

Vol. 54 · No. 05May - 2006pp. 09-14Hindi

Summary

The text explores the Jain philosophical perspective on the nature of the soul (ātman), addressing its relationship with the body, its size, and its role as an agent and experiencer. It begins by questioning whether the concept of independent souls fosters selfishness, contrasting the idea of a single universal soul with the Jain view of countless independent souls. A key discussion concerns the relationship between the immaterial soul and the material body. Jain philosophy posits that the soul is not entirely immaterial because it is bound to the body; if it were completely immaterial like space, bodily conditions would not affect it. This bond is beginningless, as the soul has always been associated with a body until liberation. A distinctive Jain doctrine is that the soul is the same size as the body it inhabits, not all-pervading as other schools hold. This is explained through the principle of contraction and expansion (saṃkoca-vistāra). The soul can contract to fit a tiny body or expand to fill a large one, a capacity unique to the soul. This process occurs through the subtle karmic body, not the gross physical body. The text argues this view provides a more coherent explanation for how an all-pervading soul could have all its experiences localized within a single body. The soul is considered both the agent (kartā) and experiencer (bhoktā) of its actions. This agency is divided into natural agency, the continuous process of change that maintains the soul's existence, and adventitious agency, which leads to rebirth in different states. A crucial implication is that no external person can directly cause another's happiness or suffering; they can only provide the circumstances. The text illustrates this with the story of a meditating ascetic who, despite being tortured with burning coals on his head, remained absorbed in supreme bliss, demonstrating that suffering is ultimately determined by one's own inner state.

Conclusion

The document's analysis of Jain philosophy presents a profound implication for personal responsibility and spiritual practice. By establishing the soul (ātman) as both the agent (kartā) and experiencer (bhoktā) of its actions, it directly challenges the common tendency to attribute one's suffering or happiness to external sources. The outcome of this perspective is a radical shift in focus: a person cannot be made happy or unhappy by another, as others can only provide the circumstances or instruments. True suffering or joy is an internal response governed by one's own karmic state and volition. This framework empowers the individual by placing the locus of control entirely within, making spiritual liberation a matter of self-directed effort rather than external intervention. The ultimate implication is that freedom from the cycle of birth and death is achievable through conscious, self-aware action, reinforcing the core Jain principle of individual accountability on the path to moksha.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Vidya

स्वामी समन्तभद्र की वाणी के आलोक में दैव और पुरुषार्थ

By डॉ. सूरजमुखी जैन

April - 1996
Jain Bharati

अवधिज्ञान-उत्पत्ति स्थान

November - 2007
Jain Bharati

जैन दर्शन में तनाव और तनाव से मुक्ति

March - 2013
Jain Vidya

प्रकाशकीय

March - 2010
Jain Vidya

तत्त्वार्थवार्तिक में प्रतिपादित मानवीय मूल्य

By डॉ. सुरेन््रकुमार जैन ' भारती '

April - 1999 - 2000
Jain Bharati

दान : एक अनुशीलन

December - 2009