Form of Taxation as depicted in the Kharosthi Documents from Chinese Turkestan
By Ratna Chandra Agrawala
Summary
Analysing hundreds of Kharosthi documents unearthed by Sir Aurel Stein at Niya, Endere and Loulan, this article reconstructs taxation in the Shan‑Shan kingdom of Chinese Turkestan in the second to fourth centuries CE. The documents show that the term palpi (palpiya), derived from Sanskrit bali, denoted a general tax paid by tenants to landlords rather than the statefile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=Form%20of%20Taxation%20as%20depicted,Dfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=Technical%20terms%20of%20taxes%3A%E2%80%94,the%20Sambitis%20and%20the%20Brabmanas%C2%AE. Other fiscal terms, including samarena, tsamghina and koyimamdhina, appear to refer to taxes on royal lands or specific types of producefile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=,%E2%80%9D. Vega‑kilme palpi is interpreted as a tax on irrigated plots, while vaka amna indicates the landlord’s share of grain as rentfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=%2811%29%20Vega,1304%20as%20rent%20%E0%A4%B2%E0%A4%BF%201%E0%AB%AC8%E2%80%9D. The documents list taxes paid in kind—cereals, fruits, pulses, oils, sugar, salt—and even animals like camelsfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=ducting%20camels%C2%AE%C2%AE%20%28nos,was%20also%20en. Officials such as the koyima, tsamghinava and sugnuta were responsible for assessment, collection and transportfile:///home/oai/share/563029_compressed-327-430.pdf#:~:text=Sadavita,the%20despatch%20of%20tax%20through. Records detail procedures for measuring fields, calculating shares, issuing receipts, remitting taxes after floods and punishing arrears. Through linguistic analysis, the author reveals a sophisticated fiscal system balancing royal demands with tenants’ obligations and shows how Indian, Central Asian and Chinese influences merged in this frontier economy. The study underscores the value of Kharosthi documents for economic history and illustrates the complexity of taxation beyond the Indian subcontinent.
Conclusion
The author’s meticulous examination of Kharosthi terminology reveals a complex taxation system in the Shan‑Shan kingdom. Taxes were levied on land, irrigation allotments and produce, collected in cereals, fruits, animals and services, and administered by designated officials. This study highlights the administrative sophistication of Central Asian polities and demonstrates how epigraphic sources can illuminate economic history.