Select Contents of Orlental Journals
By Unexhibited
Summary
This compilation provides abstracts from several contemporary Oriental and Indological journals, covering philology, epigraphy, religion, and ancient Indian history. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Institute • Durgacharan Chatterji – The Problem of Knowledge and the Four Schools of Later Buddhism: Compares Vaibhāṣikas and Sautrāntikas (who accept external reality) with Yogācāras and Mādhyamikas (who deny it). • R. Ganguli – Cattle and Cattle-rearing in Ancient India: Discusses religious value, care, feeding, diseases, and breeding of cattle. • Charu Chandra Dasgupta – Notes on the Bhāṅja Dynasties: Traces four Bhāṅja lineages using inscriptional genealogies, determining their chronological order. • K. B. Pathak – Jinendrabuddhi, Kaiyaṭa and Haradatta: Dates Jinendrabuddhi to c. 700 A.D., Jayāditya c. 661 A.D., Kaiyaṭa late 11th century, Haradatta 13th century. • S. Srikānta Śāstrī – Vidyānanda and Śaṅkara Mata: Argues that “Śaṅkara” in Vidyānanda’s Aptaparīkṣā refers to Śiva, not Śaṅkarācārya; critiques theistic Maheshvara doctrine, not Advaita. Other Contributions • N. R. Divatia – Fractional Numerals in Gujarati: Derivation of forms like doḍhā, dīḍhā from Sanskrit compounds. • D. R. Mankad – The Arctic Regions in the Ṛgveda: Refutes both Tilak’s Arctic-home theory and Dr. Das’s denials. • A. N. Upādhyē – Kannada Words in Uḍiyā Lexicons: Lists Dravidian lexical borrowings. • N. R. Divatia – The Khazars: Were They Mongols?: Brief historical-philological inquiry. • K. Gode – Notes on Indian Chronology: Fixes dates of Vīcarasudhākara (A.D. 1765), Kankilī Grantha (A.D. 1500–1510), and several commentaries; identifies Rajamalla, patron of K. Cimūṇḍa. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies • H. W. Bailey – The Word “But” in Iranian: Traces forms meaning “Buddha,” “spirit,” “Bodhisattva” across Iranian dialects. • L. D. Barnett – Pramnai: Interprets Strabo’s “Pramnai” as ascetic philosophers, not Śramaṇas or Pramāṇikas. • Jules Bloch – Aśoka et la Māgadhī: Relates Aśokan dialect to Māgadhī via linguistic evidence. • W. Caland – Corrections to Eggeling’s Translation of the Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa. • Jarl Charpentier – Antiochus, King of the Yavanas: Identifies Aśoka’s “Amtiyoka” as Antiochus I (280–261 B.C.); infers Aśoka’s coronation c. 273 B.C. • G. Cœdès – On the Origin of Arabic Numerals: Asserts Indian origin preceding their transmission to East Asia. • Gabriel Ferrand – Les grands rois du monde: Summarizes Chinese and Arabic records of four/five world-kings (China, India, Persia, Turks, etc.). • A. Berriedale Keith – The Doctrine of the Buddha: Argues that denial of Ātman was not originally Buddha’s teaching; later scholasticism introduced annihilationism. • Sylvain Lévi – Publishes a fragmentary manuscript on the Vajrayoginī Tantric cult, with historical data on Nāgārjuna and Tārānātha. • Stein Konow, L. de la Vallée Poussin, Kasten Rönnow, Aurel Stein, and others contribute on Kharoshṭhī inscriptions, Cittaviśuddhiprakaraṇa, Viśvarūpa myth, and the identification of Soma (Ephedra not likely). • C. Woolner – Ṛgveda and the Punjab: Opposes the Sarasvatī-centered view; holds Aryans occupied all Punjab. Indian Antiquary (Sept. 1931) • W. H. Moreland – Notes on Indian Maunds: Early Indian weight systems. • Biren Bonnerjea – Prāyaścitta: Shows ritual expiations are magical, not moral repentance. • A. Venkatasubbia – Athabhigīye: Explains term in Aśoka’s Rummindei inscription. • Pran Nāth – Kauṭilya’s Arthaśāstra: Original text probably in verse. Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society (Vol. XVII, 1931) • G. Rāmadas – Mandasa Plates of Anantavarmadeva: Publishes and translates Ganga copper-plates. • N. Tripāṭhī – Jaypura Grant of Dhruvananda Deva: Corrects earlier readings. • J. C. De – Observations on the Hindol Plates of Subhakara Deva: Proposes improved readings. • L. V. Rāmāswāmi Aiyar – Dravidic Names for “Palms”: Traces linguistic connections between Dravidian and Indo-Aryan tāla. • Umesa Miśra – Mīmāṃsāśāstrasārvasva of Haliyudha: Edition up to 3rd adhikaraṇa of 2nd chapter. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (Vol. VII, Nos. 1–2) • Sir Charles Faucette – Gerald Aungier’s Report on Bombay: 1673 report describing Bombay’s early British administration—population, fortifications, trade, and governance. • Padmanātha Bhattacharyya – Pañcamahāśabda in Rājataraṅgiṇī: Supports Stein’s interpretation as “five great offices,” opposing Aiyangar’s musical reading.
Conclusion
This 1931 digest crystallizes an evidence‑first Indology: precise philological and epigraphic analysis tightens chronology, refines language history, and clarifies Indo‑Iranian‑Hellenistic links—exemplified by Antiochus I’s identification in Aśoka’s edicts, prior Indian use of “Arabic” numerals, the rejection of Ephedra as Soma, and disciplined emendations to texts and inscriptions—marking a shift from sweeping conjecture to verifiable claims.