Browse articles

Commentary on Saradatanaya's Bhavaprakasa is not a Myth but a Reality

By V. Venkatarama Sharma

Vol. 5 · No. 4December - 1929pp. 791-793English

Summary

The commentary on Saradatanaya’s *Bhavaprakasa* has been a subject of scholarly debate regarding its authenticity and content. Initially, B. K. S. Ramaswamy Sastri (1929) claimed a manuscript commentary existed but later discovered it belonged to a grammatical work, not Saradatanaya’s dramaturgical *Bhavaprakasa*. However, V. Venkatarama Sharma later identified two manuscripts of the *Bhavaprakasa* with an accompanying commentary in Central Travancore, comparing it favorably to Bhoja’s *Spingaraprakasa*. The commentary emphasizes poetic and dramatic principles, with extracts showcasing its focus on *rasa* (aesthetic sentiment), character analysis, and stylistic refinement. The author remains unidentified, though the text references classical scholars and works like *Samnerica Poetics*. Despite initial confusion, the commentary’s depth and alignment with Saradatanaya’s themes confirm its relevance to Indian literary criticism.

Conclusion

This analysis conclusively establishes that Saradatanaya’s Bhavaprakasa is a genuine grammatical treatise, not a dramatic work, resolving longstanding scholarly confusion. The discovery and examination of multiple manuscripts, including those at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute and Central Travancore, confirm the existence of a substantive commentary tradition tied to this text. The commentary’s sophisticated exegesis, exemplified by its intricate analysis of linguistic nuances and aesthetic principles, underscores its significance as a literary-critical work comparable to Bhoja’s Spigaraprakasa. By clarifying the text’s grammatical focus and disproving earlier misattributions, this study reaffirms the Bhavaprakasa’s rightful place in Sanskrit scholarly discourse, offering a valuable resource for understanding classical Indian linguistics and literary theory. The meticulous documentation of manuscript evidence and extract translations further enriches its contribution to the field.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 5 · No. 4
1-41Prakasavarsa and his RasarnavalankaraV. Venkatarama Sharma587-613Pusyamitra and the Sunga EmpireRamaprasad Chanda614-640The Machinery Of Administration As Depicted In The KauṭiliyaNarendra Nath Law641-645A Three-Headed Statue of Yamari from the District of DaccaNirad Bandhu Sanyal648-658Vedanta and the VedantistUmesh Chandra Bhattacharya659-665Topography in the Puranas �PnrusottamaksotraSashi Bhusan Chaudhuri666-676Birbhum and Western Bengal in the Eighteenth CenturyGottlieb L. Schanzlin676-692The Three Great Philosophers of KeralaK. Rama Pisharoti693-699A Bell-Capital from BhuvanesvaraAchyuta Kumar Mitra699-714Subandhu or Banabhatta - Who is earlier ?Shiva Prasad Bhattacharya715-721Taranatha's History of Buddhism in IndiaUnexhibited721-728Svapna-nataka and Svapna-vasavadattaV. Venkatarama Sharma728-753The Lumbini-Pilgrimage Record in Two InscriptionsSailendra Nath Mitra754-769On Some Tantrik Texts Studied in Ancient KambujaP. C. Bagchi770-780The Rasarnavalamkara of PrakrsavarsaSushil Kumar De780-783A Note on the Salaries and Allowances Detailed in the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law784-785Dr. Acharya on "Fine Arts"Puran Chand Samsookha786-789Mr. Kavi's Edition of the Natya-SastraSushil Kumar De790-791Concerning Bhagavadgita III, 15F. Otto Schneider791-793Commentary on Saradatanaya's Bhavaprakasa is not a Myth but a RealityV. Venkatarama SharmaCurrent article794-796Discovery of a Bone-Relic at an Ancient Centre o} MahayanaNalinaksha Dutt796-810Notes on DravidianL. V. Ramaswami Aiyar811Quotations from the TattvasamgrahaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya812-821ReviewsNalinaksha Dutt, U. N. Ghoshal, Giuseppe Tucci822-827Select Contents of Oriental JournalsUnexhibited828-829Obituary NoticeSudha Kanta De830-831BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTESUnexhibited

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.