Browse articles

अकलंकदेव कृत पुण्य और पाप का विवेचन

By डॉ. सूरजमुखी जैन

Vol. 20 - 21 · No. 0April - 1999 - 2000pp. 104-110Hindi

Summary

In Jain philosophy, merit (punya) and sin (papa) are considered substances, not actions. According to Akalankadeva, actions of mind, speech, and body with virtuous intentions cause the influx of karmic matter that is merit, while actions with sinful intentions cause the influx of karmic matter that is sin. These karmic particles, bound to the soul due to delusion, non-restraint, passion, and negligence, produce experiences of pleasure and pain. Merit is defined as that which pleases the soul or causes it to experience happiness, while sin is its opposite, preventing virtuous thoughts and causing suffering. Akalankadeva explains that virtuous yoga (activity) includes non-violence, truthfulness, and devotion, while sinful yoga includes violence, falsehood, and envy. The influx of merit and sin depends on pure or defiled intentions, not merely on the external act of giving pleasure or pain to oneself or others. If intention were irrelevant, even inanimate objects or passionless ascetics would incur karmic bondage. Defilement consists of thoughts of sorrow and cruelty, while purity is the absence of such thoughts and abiding in one's own nature. There are 42 types of meritorious karmic natures, including celestial and human life spans, pleasant feelings, and noble birth, and 82 sinful natures, including knowledge-obscuring, deluding, and painful feeling karmas. Both merit and sin cause bondage, like iron or gold chains; liberation requires the complete destruction of both. However, for worldly beings, merit is preferable to sin because it leads to desirable outcomes. The merit of a wrong-believer, motivated by desire, leads to arrogance and further sin, while the merit of a right-believer, accompanied by pure thought-activity, indirectly aids liberation. Thus, one should first abandon sin and cultivate merit to obtain a favorable birth and body, then transcend both to achieve ultimate liberation.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates that in Jain philosophy, both merit (puṇya) and demerit (pāpa) are material karmas binding the soul, with liberation requiring the complete destruction of both. While both are forms of bondage, the text establishes a crucial distinction: puṇya is necessary for attaining favorable rebirths, superior bodies, and the spiritual conditions essential for liberation, whereas pāpa leads only to suffering. For the spiritually advanced, puṇya serves as a stepping stone toward liberation, while for the deluded, it can generate arrogance and further bondage. The ultimate implication is that aspirants must first abandon pāpa and cultivate puṇya to acquire the necessary physical and intellectual instruments for liberation, before finally transcending both to achieve the soul's pure, unconditioned state.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 20 - 21 · No. 0
6प्रकाशकीय7-11सम्पादकीय12-22स्वामी भट्टाकलंकदेव - व्यक्तित्व एवं कर्तृत्वश्री कुन्दनलाल जैन23भावना24-34जिनशासन के प्रभावक आचार्य अकलंकश्री रमाकान्त जैन35व्रतीप्रो. महेन्द्रकुमार जैन, न्यायाचार्य36-40अनेक अलंकरणों से अलंकृत आचार्य अकलंकदेवडॉ. कपूरचंद जैन41ध्यान42-56जैन-न्याय के उन्नायक : भट्ट अकलंकदेवडॉ. राजेन्द्रकुमार बंसल57हिंसाप्रो. महेन्द्रकुमार जैन, न्यायाचार्य58-67अनेकान्त के प्रतिष्ठापक आचार्य अकलंकदेवडॉ. अशोककुमार जैन68-73आचार्य अकलंकदेव और उनका नय-विवेचनविद्यावाचस्पति डॉ. श्रीरंजनसूरिदेव74-88अकलंकदेव की कृति तत्त्वार्थवार्तिकडॉ. रमेशचन्द जैन89आस्रव के कारणप्रो. महेन्द्रकुमार जैन, न्यायाचार्य90-93तत्त्वार्थराजवार्तिक और कर्मबन्ध के प्रत्ययडॉ. (श्रीमती) कुसुम पटोरिया94-103तत्त्वार्थवार्तिक में प्रतिपादित मानवीय मूल्यडॉ. सुरेन््रकुमार जैन ' भारती '104-110अकलंकदेव कृत पुण्य और पाप का विवेचनडॉ. सूरजमुखी जैनCurrent article111वैयावृत्य112-123द्रव्य-पर्यायात्मक वस्तु ज्ञान का विषयडॉ. राजकुमारी जेन

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Vidya

इस अंक के सहयोगी रचनाकार

By डॉ. झादित्य प्रचण्डया 'बीति', डॉ. कमलचन्द सोगाणी, डॉ. गंगाराम गग, डॉ. गदाधर सिंहू, डॉ. जयकुमार जेन, डॉ. दैवेन्दकुमार शास्त्री, डॉ. बरत सुरिदेव, भौ घौय

October - 1987
Jain Bharati

अनेकांत : विमति के बीच सहमति

April - 2006