निमित्त-उपादान : चिंतन के कुछ बिंदु
By डॉ. अनेकान्त कुमार जैन
Summary
The article by Dr. Anekant Kumar Jain examines the philosophical debate on cause and effect, focusing on the roles of nimitta (instrumental cause) and upadana (material cause) in Jain philosophy. It references the Sanmatisutra by Acharya Siddhasena, which lists five causes—time, nature, destiny, prior action, and human effort—as jointly responsible for the occurrence of any effect, emphasizing a multifaceted approach. The author highlights a key teaching by Acharya Vidyānandji Muniraj: "Nimitta does nothing, but without nimitta nothing happens," which underscores the need for a balanced, non-absolutist perspective. The text critiques two extreme groups in society: nimitta-priya people, who overemphasize external rituals and nimitta while neglecting inner purification, and upadana-priya people, who dismiss nimitta's significance and sometimes even its existence. Both groups fail to grasp the true nature of reality due to personal biases. The author argues that both nimitta and upadana are distinct, independent entities. Through the lens of anekanta (non-absolutism) and syadvada (sevenfold predication), each is real in its own essence but unreal in relation to the other. Nimitta only performs its own function, not that of upadana, and vice versa. Believing that either can directly cause the other's effect is a one-sided, absolutist view. The conclusion stresses that understanding these concepts requires patience and freedom from prejudice. While nimitta's presence is necessary for any transformation, the spiritual perspective prioritizes the soul's independent effort and pure nature, which is not dependent on nimitta. The author clarifies that spiritual statements like "nimitta does nothing" are expressions of a shift in viewpoint, not a denial of nimitta's existence. In reality, both nimitta and upadana coexist, each performing its own role and mutually assisting each other without one being subordinate to the other. A person with right insight perceives both but accepts only the true nature of things
Conclusion
The article concludes that the relationship between nimitta (instrumental cause) and upadana (material cause) is not one of dominance but of coexistence, where each operates independently while mutually assisting the other. The author emphasizes that adopting an anekantavada perspective is essential to avoid the extremes of overemphasizing either cause, which leads to one-sided views. The implications for spiritual practice are significant: while nimitta is necessary for any transformation, the soul’s ultimate liberation depends on its own upadana, free from dependence on external factors. The conclusion urges readers to transcend personal biases and understand the true nature of both causes, thereby achieving a balanced, correct view that aligns with Jain philosophical principles and supports genuine spiritual progress.