Browse articles

Historical Research: Princes' Duty to promote Scholarship

By Unexhibited

Vol. 6 · No. 1March - 1930pp. 184-185English

Summary

The text discusses historical research priorities, emphasizing the duty of Indian princes to promote scholarship and preserve historical records. It highlights the Indian Historical Records Commission's efforts and notes that many state archives remain unexplored, containing valuable documents crucial for understanding India's past. The author stresses that knowledge of historical factors shaping national identity is essential for development. Indigenous literature and arts, once thriving under royal patronage, now require renewed support. The text also critiques scholarly interpretations of ancient texts, specifically addressing errors in Ramaprasad Chanda's analysis of Pusyamitra and the Shunga Empire. It corrects misinterpretations of Jaina Canon references and inscription translations, advocating for accurate historical scholarship. The principles of royal patronage and scholarly rigor remain central to advancing India's cultural and historical understanding.

Conclusion

This document underscores the critical role of princes in fostering scholarship and historical inquiry, emphasizing their unique capacity to unlock archival wealth for national progress. By patronizing research and preserving historical narratives, princes not only honor their ancestors' legacies but also shape India's cultural and intellectual trajectory. The analysis of Taksashila's historical context and the critique of scholarly interpretations, such as those on Pusyamitra and the Shunga Empire, highlight the enduring impact of princely support on academic rigor and historical accuracy. Such efforts, as argued in the Viceroy's address, are indispensable for nurturing national identity and ensuring that historical wisdom informs contemporary societal development.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 6 · No. 1
1-30Old Buddhist Shrines at Bodh-GayaB. M. Barua31-38The Machinery of Administration in the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law39-45The Two Nirvanadhatus According to the VibhasaLouis de La Vallée Poussin45-60A newly discovered Copperplate from TipperaDinesh Chandra Bhattacharya60-71Grant of Bhaskara Varman of Kamarupa and the Nagara BrahmanasJogendra Chandra Ghosh72-80Problems of the NatyasastraMano Mohan Ghosh81-86Birbhum and Western Bengal in the Eighteenth CenturyGottlieb L. Schanzlin87-96Literary Patronage Under the Zamorins of CalicutA. Govinda Warrier97-107On Some Tantrik Texts Studied in Ancient KambujaP. C. Bagchi108-113Sankara on the Relation between the Vedas and ReasonSatindra Kumar Mukherjee114-126Antiquity of TantricismChintaharan Chakravarti127-144A short sketch of the Second Dynasty of the Zamorins of Malabar (1742-1774)K. V. Krishna Ayyar145-149Pre-Dravidian or Proto-DravidianJean Przyluski149-152A Note on the chronological Relation of Kanishka and Rudradaman IHem Chandra Raychaudhuri153-168Pala Chronology — A Reply to Prof. BanerjiDinesh Chandra Bhattacharya168Dharmapada and AbhidhanvasasamhitaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya169The Date of ShankaracharyaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya169-171Is it Caryacaryaviniscaya or Ascaryacaryacaya?Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya171Shankara's Reference to a Buddhist PassageVidhushekhara Bhattacharya172-175The Twin-gods Asvins of the Rg-VedaEkendra Nath Ghosh175-178BharatavakyaVibhutinatha Jha178-180Some new Facts about MatsyendranathaChintaharan Chakravarti181-183A Note on The Paura-JānapadaV. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar183-184Reply to Mr. Dikshitar's NoteNarendra Nath Law184-185Historical Research: Princes' Duty to promote ScholarshipUnexhibitedCurrent article185-187A Few Notes on Pusyamitra and the Sunga EmpirePuran Chand Samsookha188-195ReviewsH. D. Bhattacharya196-200Select Contents of Oriental JournalsUnexhibited201-203Obituary Notice: Henry BeveridgeSurendra Nath Sen

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reply to Mr. Dikshitar's Note

By Narendra Nath Law

March - 1930