Browse articles

Art and Philosophy in Hindu Temple Building

By Prafulla Chandra Basu

Vol. 2 · No. 2June - 1926pp. 225-231English

Summary

In this article the author examines the symbolic and philosophical foundations of Hindu temple architecture by tracing the origins of temple design to the village plan described in the R̥gveda. Villages and early temples were elliptical or quadrangular enclosures with walls, four gates aligned with the cardinal points and an internal road running around the central shrine. These features survived in medieval temples like Jagannātha at Puri and Mahākāla at Ujjain. Inside the temple complex two perpendicular roads intersect in the centre while a circumambulatory path (parikramāṇavīthi) encircles the sanctum. The main shrine is divided into three or four parts: the bhoga‑maṇḍira, the nāṭa‑maṇḍira, a passage or jagamohana, and the śrī‑maṇḍira housing the deity. The four subsidiary shrines at the gates are dedicated to Brahmā, Viṣṇu‑Sūrya, Śiva and Viṣṇu‑Nārāyaṇa, embodying the cosmic functions of creation, maintenance, destruction and dissolution. The article argues that this arrangement reflects an ancient Aryan cosmological philosophy of cyclical evolution and counter‑evolution. It discusses the evolution of Vaiṣṇavism and Śaivism, noting that they were originally complementary aspects of one religion and only later became distinct sects. The author traces the incorporation of village‑temple symbolism into Buddhist architecture, the impact of Greek sculptural traditions on Indian art after Alexander’s invasion, and the development of the Gandhāra school. He explains that temple superstructures such as the lotus‑topped śikhara and the stūpa‑like dome symbolise different metaphysical concepts, while practices like pradakṣiṇā (circumambulation) and darśana (seeing the deity) illustrate how architecture shapes ritual. The article concludes by emphasising that Hindu temples are not arbitrary structures but living embodiments of metaphysical ideas and cultural history, synthesising indigenous and foreign influences into a uniquely Indian architectural tradition.

Conclusion

The author concludes that Hindu temple architecture is deeply rooted in ancient village layouts and Aryan cosmology. The four gates, subsidiary shrines and division of the main shrine reflect the cosmic functions and the cyclical view of creation, preservation and dissolution. Over centuries this architecture integrated Buddhist and Greek elements yet retained its symbolic core. Understanding these metaphysical foundations enables modern observers to appreciate temples not just as art but as expressions of a worldview that sees the temple as a microcosm of the universe.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 2 · No. 2
225-231Art and Philosophy in Hindu Temple BuildingPrafulla Chandra BasuCurrent article232-249Rasatala or the Under-WorldNandu Lal Dey250-261Indo-China in the Records of Chinese PilgrimsLouis Finot262-289PatanjaliPrabhat Chandra Chakravarti290-298The Trade of IndiaP. T. Srinivas Iyengar299-312A Comparative Survey of Indian PaintingAjit Ghosh313-342The Kedarpur Copper-plate Inscription of Sri CandradevaHaridas Mitra342-344Sukra�s Economies in Hindu ScienceBenoy Kumar Sarkar345-350Situation of Ravana's Lanka : On the EquatorV. H. Vader351-352Setagiri of the Nasik InseriptionVidyasagar Sadashiv Bakhle353-372Hindu Politics in ItalianBenoy Kumar Sarkar373-383Indian Literature AbroadPrabhat Kumar Mukherji384King Harsa and Aihole InscriptionChintaharan Chakravarti385-407MISCELLANY - The Janapada and the PauraNarendra Nath Law408Aditya, the supposed author of an ArthasastraMaurice Winternitz409-410The Evidence of Panini on Vasudeva-WorshipUmesh Chandra Bhattacharya410-413Recent Advance in South Indian EpigraphyC. S. Srinivasachari413-415Rupakas - how many are they ?Ashok Nath Bhattacharya415-416The First commentary on the MahabhasyaM. Hiriyanna416-418A Short note on Mr. Jayaswal's interpretation of a Mahabhasya passage in his "Hindu Polity" (p. 122)K. G. Subrahmanyam418-419A passage of the AbhidharmakosavyakhyaVidhushekhara Bhattacharya420-430Mr. Benoy Kumar Sarkar�s criticism of Hindu Political Theories�A ReplyU. N. Ghoshal430Ghoshal Defending HimselfBenoy Kumar Sarkar431-435ReviewsChintaharan Chakravarti, K. K. Banerji, Jehangir C. Tavadia436-437Select Contents of Orlental JournalsUnexhibited438-439BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTESUnexhibited440Obituary NoticeC. S. Srinivasachari

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.