साधन-साध्य : एक मीमांसा

Summary

The text discusses the relationship between means and ends, emphasizing that purity of means is essential when the end is pure. It notes that if the end itself is impure, the question of pure means is only partially valid. The author references Acharya Bhikshu and Mahatma Gandhi, who both stressed purity of means in their respective fields of religion and politics. The text argues that in spiritual pursuits like liberation, impure means such as violence, falsehood, or attachment cannot lead to the goal. It presents an example of Pandit Magh, who gave his wife's bangles to a needy Brahmin, questioning whether this act was religious or social charity. The text also recounts an incident where a person asked whether searching for a lost child would be religious or not, highlighting the absurdity of applying such distinctions to natural human actions. It discusses the difference between social and religious acts, stating that charity supporting indulgence is not religious. The text explores the concept of non-violence, noting that while household life cannot be entirely non-violent, violence cannot be a means to liberation. It describes three types of self-protectors according to Lord Mahavira: one who inspires through religious motivation, one who remains silent, and one who leaves the place. The text concludes by discussing the application of non-violence in society, including an attempt to close slaughterhouses during the Paryushan festival, where authorities asked what would be offered in return.