Browse articles

Ganga in Ceylon and India

By J. C. De

Vol. 7 · No. 2June - 1931pp. 359-362English, Sanskrit

Summary

Under the heading “Miscellany,” this short note addresses the meaning and distribution of the term “gāṅgā” in epigraphical sources and regional nomenclature. The Gunai­ghar Grant of Vainyagupta, a 6th‑century copperplate from Bengal, uses the phrase “paścimena Ha(?)‑cātagaṃgā” to denote a boundary described as a “stream.” The editor renders “gang” (gāṅgā) as “stream,” pointing out that in Eastern Bengal the word still carries that sense. The author cites additional inscriptions where “gāṅgā” simply means stream or river rather than specifically the sacred Ganges. He notes that the average North Indian associates “Ganges” exclusively with the river at Benares but may attach different sanctity to its regional branches such as the Padmā or Bhāgirathi. In Ceylon, numerous rivers incorporate the term “gāṅgā” in their names: the Kelāni‑gāṅgā near Colombo, the Kalu‑gāṅgā in the Western Province, the Nilvala‑gāṅgā in the Southern Province, the Māgama‑gāṅgā and Kataragāma‑gāṅgā in the east, and the Mahāweli‑gāṅgā, the island’s longest river. These names show that “gāṅgā” simply means river in Sinhala. The author argues that the presence of “gāṅgā” in place names across India and Ceylon reflects a linguistic rather than a religious usage. He cautions against reading cultic significance into geographic names and suggests that, in several inscriptions, “bathing in the Ha(?)‑cāta‑gaṃgā” cannot be taken to mean bathing in the Gangā river. The note thus underscores the importance of contextualising epigraphic terminology and recognising regional linguistic variations.

Conclusion

By examining inscriptions and modern place names, the article shows that “gāṅgā” often functions as a generic term for river rather than referencing the sacred Ganges. Rivers in Sri Lanka and Eastern India carry the suffix “gāṅgā” without implying any connection to North Indian pilgrimage. Recognising this linguistic usage prevents misinterpretation of epigraphs and highlights the need to consider regional semantics when analysing ancient texts.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 7 · No. 2
214-244Origin of the Bell-CapitalAchyuta Kumar Mitra245-253Topography in the PuranasSashi Bhusan Chaudhuri253-258Dvaidhibhava in the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law259-286Bodhisattva Pratimoksa SutraNalinaksha Dutt287-300The First Saka of CitodSubimal Chandra Datta301-308Mandana, Suresvara and Bhavabhuti : The Problem of their IdentityDinesh Chandra Bhattacharya309-318Some Notes on Skanda-KarttikeyaManmatha Mukhopadhyay319-330Kulasekhara of KeralaK. Rama Pisharoti331-333A Surya Icon from a Dasavatara Temple, PaganNiharranjan Roy334-342Vilvamangalam SvamiyarsA. Govinda Warrier343-358Early Visnuism and Narayaniya WorshipMrinal Das Gupta359-362Ganga in Ceylon and IndiaJ. C. DeCurrent article362-364An Early Supporter of ShivajiJadunath Sarkar365-366The Webbed Finger of BuddhaAnanda Kentish Coomaraswamy367-370A Few Evidences on the Age of the KathavatthuDwijendra Lal Barua370-371The Age of the Visnu PuranaV. R. Ramachandra Dikshitar371-376More on ManimekhalaSylvain Levi377-379Derivation of PaliS. V. Viswanatha380-383Problems of the NatyasastraHarihara V. Trivedi384-388Technical Terms in the Hindu Revenue SystemU. N. Ghoshal389-410The English Translation of the KautiliyaNarendra Nath Law410-412An Inscription dated in the Reign of Emperor Muhammad ShahDineshchandra Sircar412-412Candasutinam in the Nanaghat Cave InscriptionDineshchandra Sircar413-418The BhagavrttiKshitish Chandra Chatterjee418-419The Authorship of the AnunyasaKshitish Chandra Chatterjee420-427ReviewsAnanda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Subimal Chandra Datta428-432Select Contents of Oriental JournalsUnexhibited433-434Bibliographical NotesUnexhibited

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.