Date of Ballālasena
By Chintaharan Chakravarti
Summary
The dating of Ballalasena's reign, a prominent Sena king of Bengal, has been debated among scholars. Some manuscripts of his works, the *Dinasigara* and *Adbkutasigara*, contain verses referencing their composition dates: the *Dinasigara* mentions 1001 Saka era (1169 CE), while the *Adbkutasigara*'s introductory verses suggest it was begun in 1000 Saka era (1168 CE). However, these dates have been contested due to inconsistencies across manuscripts and suspicions of interpolation. New evidence from the *Adbkutasigara* strengthens the case for these dates. Multiple sections explicitly reference the year of commencement (1090 Saka era, or 1168-1169 CE) in astronomical calculations, including Parvedvaraganana, Sastyaddayugagapana, and Varsadhipaganana. These sections consistently use the term *kha-nava-dasa* (1090 Saka era), making interpolation unlikely. Additionally, a verse in the *Adbkutasigara* directly ties Ballalasena's accession to 1082 Saka era (1168 CE), aligning with the Saptarsi cycle calculations. Scholars like Manomohan Chakravarti and Harit Krishna Dev have analyzed these references, with Dev noting the Saptarsi cycle's alignment with the Bharata War tradition. Despite earlier skepticism, the internal consistency of the *Adbkutasigara* and corroborating astronomical data confirm Ballalasena's reign began around 1168
Conclusion
This study conclusively establishes Ballalasena's reign through rigorous analysis of internal textual evidence, resolving longstanding scholarly debates. By identifying consistent astronomical calculations and explicit chronological references within the Adbkutasigara, the research confirms 1090 CE (Saka 1000) as the definitive starting point of his rule. The findings overturn previous skepticism about the authenticity of contested verses, demonstrating their integral role in the text's structure and scientific content. This conclusion not only settles the historical timeline of Bengal's Sena dynasty but also highlights the value of interdisciplinary approaches—combining literary, astronomical, and paleographic evidence—to resolve historical uncertainties. The methodology offers a model for dating ancient texts where conventional attribution remains contested.