करकण्डचरिउ में प्रतिपादित इतिहास व संस्कृति
By भागचन्द्र भास्कर
Summary
The text discusses the historical and cultural aspects presented in the *Karakandacariu*, a narrative poem by the 12th-century Jain monk Kanakamara. The work holds a distinct place in the Apabhramsha literary tradition. Kanakamara acknowledges earlier scholars like Siddhasena, Samantabhadra, and others. The poem consists of ten *sandhis* (cantos) with 201 *kadavakas* (stanzas), primarily using the *Pajjhatika* meter, and is noted for its poetic and graceful style. In Jain tradition, Karakanda is considered a *Pratyeka-buddha*, akin to a solitary Buddha in Buddhism, who attains liberation through self-initiation without teaching. This concept appears borrowed from Buddhism. Both traditions originally list four such figures: Karakanda, Naggada, Nami, and Durmukha. While Jain texts like the *Uttaradhyayana* merely mention them, later traditions, especially the Shvetambara, expanded their narratives. The *Nandisutra* does not limit their number, but the *Rishibhashita* specifies forty-five. Post-10th century, Jain acharyas composed poetic works on these figures, including Tilakasuri's *Pratyekabuddhacarita* and others. In the Digambara tradition, only Karakanda is made the hero of a narrative, portrayed as a miraculous personality rather than a *Pratyeka-buddha*. Kanakamara is the first poet in this tradition, followed by others who incorporated Karakanda's story into their works. Although a biographical text, *Karakandacariu* reflects history and culture. Dr. Hiralal identifies the composition site as "Asaiya" or "Apanapuri," near Bhopal, where Jain ruins and a statue of Tirthankara Shantinatha exist. The text mentions kings whose names align with the Chandella dynasty
Conclusion
The analysis of the *Karkaṇḍacariu* reveals that while it is a literary work, it serves as a significant, albeit fragmented, mirror of historical and cultural currents from roughly the 8th to 10th centuries. Its primary outcome is the illumination of the complex relationship between Jain and Buddhist traditions, particularly through the concept of the *pratyeka-buddha*, which Jainism adapted. The text’s implications are most concrete in its geographical and political references, linking the narrative to the Chera, Chola, and Pandya kingdoms, as well as to Sri Lanka and the Silahara dynasty. The identification of the Terapur caves with the modern-day Gharapuri caves provides a tangible archaeological connection. However, the work’s dense narrative style limits its cultural detail, offering only glimpses of social customs like marriage rites. Ultimately, the *Karkaṇḍacariu* is a valuable, if incomplete, historical source that corroborates the existence of