Browse articles

मर्यादा की जिजीविषा

By शुभू पटवा

Vol. 50 · No. 02February - 2002pp. 5-6Hindi

Summary

The text explores the concept of discipline (maryada) through the evolving perspective of Acharya Shri Mahapragya, from his 1973 statements as "Muni Nathmal" to his role as the head of the Terapanth religious order in 2002. It presents his view that discipline is not inherently meaningful or meaningless; its significance has limits. The text suggests that despite his changed position, his fundamental thinking on discipline remains consistent. It contrasts the nature of a sect (panth) as a lifeless shadow with the independent creative power of individuals like Buddha, Shankar, Kabir, and Gandhi, whose energy became absorbed into sects. The text argues that discipline is necessary only for the negligent (pramatta), while the non-negligent (apramatta) naturally transcend it, making discipline unnecessary for them. It criticizes the modern tendency to equate freedom with licentiousness, which disrupts social harmony and leads to environmental imbalance, political-economic arbitrariness, and social inequality. The text asserts that a living community like the Terapanth, with its 244-45 year history and 138-year tradition of discipline, has remained dynamic because its discipline nourishes rather than burdens it. It argues that the openness of the Terapanth has prevented it from being bound by the shadows of its leaders, allowing fresh vitality to circulate. The text concludes by urging a broader perspective, suggesting that rejecting a good thing simply because it belongs to a particular sect is itself a narrow view, and that collective efforts to awaken a will to live within discipline are necessary.

Conclusion

The document’s implications center on the critical need to revive a nuanced understanding of discipline (maryada) in contemporary society, distinguishing it from rigidity or oppression. The analysis of Acharya Mahapragya’s evolving views—from a monk to a sect leader—reveals that true discipline arises from inner awareness and non-attachment, not external imposition. The text warns that today’s confusion between freedom and licentiousness has led to social disharmony, environmental imbalance, and political-economic exploitation. However, the Terapanth sect’s 138-year tradition of discipline is presented as a living counterexample, showing that when rules are rooted in vitality rather than dogma, they sustain rather than stifle. The ultimate outcome is a call for collective efforts to foster a “will to live” for discipline, not as a burden but as a path to genuine freedom and social equilibrium.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.