Will in Early Buddhist Scriptures
By C. A. F. Rhys Davids
Summary
The analysis of "Will in Early Buddhist Scriptures" examines the absence of a specific term for "will" in early Buddhist texts, despite their emphasis on training the will through ethical and spiritual practices. The author notes that while the Pali Canon uses terms like *cetana* (intention), *chanda* (desire), and *viriya* (energy), these do not fully capture the concept of a distinct "will" or "willer." Translators' reliance on "desire" often obscures the nuanced ethical spectrum, from lust to aspiration, and fails to highlight the teaching's focus on spiritual effort. The text argues that early Indian thought, including pre-Buddhist Upanishads, lacked a clear concept of will, and the Buddhist tradition inherited this limitation. Despite implied references to will-like qualities (e.g., craving, effort), the absence of a dedicated term suggests a conceptual gap. The author posits that the Buddhist church's later development of *anatta* (non-self) doctrine further hindered the recognition of will as a central force. Key points include the dynamic nature of mind and life, where moral transformation depends on one's capacity to exert will (*cetana*). The Path involves struggles against negative mental states and the cultivation of psychic powers (*iddhi*), emphasizing will as the driving force behind enlightenment. The analysis concludes that early Buddhist thought framed humans as active agents in their moral development, yet the lack of a coherent "will" concept left a significant theoretical gap, later partially addressed in Abhidharma through terms like *cetana* and *manas*.
Conclusion
The absence of a specific term for 'will' in early Buddhist scriptures, despite their emphasis on training the will, reveals a significant linguistic and conceptual gap. This omission, coupled with the reliance on terms like 'desire' and 'energy,' highlights the early Buddhist tradition's struggle to articulate the role of volition in spiritual practice. The implications of this absence suggest that the Buddha's teachings, while profoundly impacting ethical and psychological development, were constrained by the linguistic limitations of their time. The later development of terms like 'citation' and the philosophical debates surrounding 'anatta' further underscore the complexity of conceptualizing will in early Buddhist thought. Ultimately, this analysis underscores the importance of historical and linguistic context in understanding the evolution of Buddhist psychology and its enduring influence on spiritual training.