India That Is Bharat: Coloniality, Civilisation, and Constitution
By J. Sai Deepak
Summary
J. Sai Deepak's *India That Is Bharat* examines European colonialism's enduring impact on India, defining four colonial forms and emphasizing 'coloniality'—the mental domination through cultural subversion. The book critiques post-colonialism for assuming colonial mindset's end with colonial rule, arguing it persists in independent societies. Deepak traces Eurocentrism to the 15th-century 'Age of Discovery,' linking it to colonial exploitation. He contrasts Asia's retention of indigenous faiths with the Americas and Africa's religious conversion, highlighting Asia's 'living indigenous civilizations.' The author asserts British-imposed secularism and legal frameworks suppressed indigenous systems, serving colonial interests under the guise of neutrality. He challenges the notion that India lacked a nation-state before 1857, citing the Mauryan Empire's unity. Deepak advocates decoloniality through reclaiming indigenous consciousness in history, education, and governance, proposing constitutional indigenization. While acknowledging British laws' outdated nature and the need for reform, he emphasizes retaining beneficial aspects like English-language access to scientific advancements. The review underscores the necessity of reinterpreting India's history and institutions through an Indian lens, balancing colonial legacies with indigenous heritage.
Conclusion
The book *India That Is Bharat* challenges conventional post-colonial narratives by emphasizing the enduring impact of European coloniality on India, particularly through cultural and constitutional imposition. It argues that decoloniality must address the lingering colonial mindset shaped by language, education, and Western-inspired legal frameworks, which often marginalized indigenous systems. The author advocates for reclaiming an Indian consciousness rooted in pre-colonial civilizational continuity, particularly in faith, history, and governance. While acknowledging the benefits of English and modern legal frameworks, the text underscores the need for constitutional indigenization to align with India’s civilizational ethos. Ultimately, the work calls for a critical re-examination of colonial legacies and a reimagining of India’s identity beyond Eurocentric paradigms, balancing historical pride with contemporary legal adaptability.