Browse articles

The Tarka‑Bhāṣā‑Vārtika of Śubhāvijaya

By Narayan M. Kansara

Vol. 191994-1995pp. 134-154English

Summary

This note introduces a newly noticed commentary on the *Tarkabhāṣā* of Keśava Miśra (c. 1275 CE), a Nyāya primer that subsumes the six Vaiśeṣika categories under the Nyāya category of *artha* (objects of knowledge)file:///home/oai/share/split_pdfs/19_Devanagari_Title8.pdf#:~:text=Vaisesika%20and%20Nyaya%20philosophies%20actually,Prameya. The Vārtika was composed by Śubhāvijaya Gani, a seventeenth‑century Jaina monk who describes himself as a disciple of Hīravijayasūri, a contemporary of Emperor Akbar. Śubhāvijaya wrote at least four other works, including the *Syādvādabhāṣāsūtra* and *Senapraśnāśarasangraha*file:///home/oai/share/split_pdfs/19_Devanagari_Title8.pdf#:~:text=Subhavijaya%20has%20authored%20at%20least,S%20Hie%20Piamottaromalo. The author explains that previous scholars such as Satis Chandra Vidyābhūṣaṇa overlooked this commentary because it survives in only two manuscripts preserved at the L.D. Institute of Indology (nos. 20796 and 30486). The present article summarises the contents of the vārtika and notes that its printed edition distinguishes Keśava’s original *Tarkabhāṣā* sutras in bold type from Śubhāvijaya’s prose commentaryfile:///home/oai/share/split_pdfs/19_Devanagari_Title8.pdf#:~:text=Indology%2C%20Ahmedabad%2C%20viz,the%20riiM%20work%20TBV%20of. The note emphasises the importance of this Jain contribution to Nyāya‑Vaiśeṣika literature and signals plans for a full critical edition in a future issue.

Conclusion

Highlighting an overlooked Jain commentary on a foundational Nyāya text, the article broadens our view of early modern Indian logic. By situating Śubhāvijaya within the lineage of Hīravijayasūri and by noting the hybrid Nyāya‑Vaiśeṣika character of *Tarkabhāṣā*, the author encourages scholars to reassess Jain contributions to Indian philosophy and to consult manuscript repositories for unnoticed works.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 19
1-20Origin and Development of Theatre in Ancient IndiaRadhavallabh Tripathi21-23Reconsideration of Sri Śaṅkuka’s Views on Rasa‑NispattiTapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi24-42Visvanātha’s Kavyaprakāśadarpana and SahityadarpaṇaJagruti S. Pandya43-47On MIA *lagg* Used as a ‘Vector’ VerbHarivallabh Chunilal Bhayani48-49A Puzzle for the Scholars of Buddhist HistoryNagin J Shah50-62Some Common Elements in Brahmanism and BuddhismRatilal N. Mehta63-65The Jain Concept of Śramaṇa in the Aupapātika SūtraCh. Lalitha66-73Karma and Freewill: A Comparative Study of Hinduism, Buddhism and JainismArvind Sharma74-79Recent Research in the History of GujaratHariprasad G. Shastri80-85Management of Temples at Nāḍol during the Caūhān PeriodRam Vallabh Somani86-90Continuity of Tradition in Medieval Sculpture and Painting in Western IndiaShridhar Andhare91-99मन्त्रार्थवर्तन में यास्क एवं वेदकृतादिभाष्यकारों का वैचित्र्यBharti Satyapal Bhagat100-107संस्कृत साहित्य में नूतन प्रयोगJaiprakash Narayan Dwivedi108-111भरतपुर क्षेत्रीय चित्रित स्थल एवं चित्रण विषयTanuja Singh112-122‘त्रिवेन्द्रम्‑रूपक’ मां सन्स्कारुपनो विशेष विनियोगVasantkumar M. Bhatt123-125ક多少ક प्रतीरूप अभिलेखो (Gujarati title approximated)Lakshmanbhai Bhojak126-128चौलक्य भीमदेव … तामपत्र (वि सं १२६३)Narayan M. Kansara129-133अनुवादवृत्तिरस्मिः: प्रामाण्याप्रामाण्यम्Lalita Chakraborty134-154The Tarka‑Bhāṣā‑Vārtika of ŚubhāvijayaNarayan M. KansaraCurrent article155-175ReviewsNarayan M. Kansara176-178ObituariesJitendra B. Shah, Shridhar Andhare

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.