प्रास्ताविक
Summary
The text discusses the preservation and transmission of the teachings of Lord Mahavira, initially compiled by his chief disciple Indrabhuti into twelve angas. Over time, as memory declined, much of this knowledge was lost, prompting efforts to commit the remaining teachings to writing. Among the key figures in this endeavor, Acharya Kundakunda is highlighted as foremost. The text emphasizes the importance of dharma, which is described as invisible yet essential for life, providing vitality and refining consciousness. It is not external but internal, and seeking it outside is futile. Dharma and a dharmic person are interdependent; without a dharmic person, dharma does not exist, and vice versa. Acharya Kundakunda defines dharma as conduct characterized by equanimity, free from delusion and agitation. Acharya Amritachandra elaborates that dharma lifts beings from the cycle of transmigration caused by false views and passions, establishing them in pure consciousness. The text further explains that right faith is the root of dharma, and without it, liberation is unattainable. Even those who practice restraint but lack right faith cannot achieve liberation. Restraint is of two types: for ascetics and householders. Ascetics, as true gurus, are highly revered, with Kabir placing the guru above even God. The text warns against ascetics lacking inner purity, stating that external appearance is insignificant without corresponding inner qualities. Acharya Kundakunda emphasizes that the true mark of an ascetic is inner disposition, not outward form. Liberation comes from inner states, not from renouncing family. The text also includes moral teachings attributed to Tiruvalluvar, such as purity of heart, non-violence, and the value of good conduct. Acharya Kundakunda is portrayed as a selfless teacher whose writings, free from deceit and desire, continue to guide beings through darkness. The text concludes by noting that the journal issue is a small contribution to the celebration of his bimillennium, featuring articles by various scholars.
Conclusion
This document underscores the critical distinction between external religious forms and authentic inner spiritual transformation, as articulated by Acharya Kundakunda. The implications are profound: mere renunciation, ascetic garb, or ritual observance are deemed insufficient without genuine inner purity and right conduct. The text warns that a teacher lacking true spiritual substance can lead both themselves and their followers astray, emphasizing that liberation is achieved through inner states, not outward displays. The outcome is a reaffirmation that the essence of dharma lies in cultivating a mind free from attachment and aversion, with the ultimate goal being self-realization. This perspective challenges superficial religiosity, redirecting focus toward the purification of consciousness as the sole path to spiritual progress and liberation.