જૈન દર્શનમાં માનવ-પ્રામાણ્યની સાંપ્રત સમયમાં ઉપાદેયતા
By Manibhai E. Prajapati
Summary
This Gujarati‑language article examines the relevance of the Jain doctrines of mat (personal opinion) and pramāṇa (valid cognition) during times of hardship or moral crisis, termed saṃtaap. The author first outlines the Jain classification of knowledge, distinguishing between subjective viewpoints and authoritative knowledge. He then discusses how practitioners can assess the reliability of their perceptions and beliefs when confronted with suffering. Drawing on examples from Jain narratives and monastic teachings, the paper shows that spiritual progress requires recognising the limitations of one’s own opinions and seeking guidance from scripture and enlightened teachers. It emphasises that the pramāṇa of intuition or scriptural testimony can provide solace and clarity when emotions cloud judgment. The article also explores how the discipline of contemplating multiple perspectives (anekāntavāda) helps adherents avoid dogmatism and maintain compassion in difficult times. The author argues that in modern life, characterised by stress and uncertainty, these epistemological tools remain valuable for cultivating resilience and ethical responsiveness. By integrating philosophical analysis with practical advice, the article highlights the adaptability of Jain thought to contemporary challenges.
Conclusion
The discussion concludes that the Jain emphasis on evaluating personal opinions against recognised sources of knowledge fosters mental stability during periods of distress. By reminding practitioners to balance subjective experience with objective standards and to consider multiple viewpoints, the doctrines of mat and pramāṇa offer practical guidance for ethical decision‑making and emotional well‑being.